Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 308 Ford Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
J Fluency Disord. 2010 Jun;35(2):92-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
Bullying in school-age children is a global epidemic. School personnel play a critical role in eliminating this problem. The goals of this study were to examine speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) perceptions of bullying, endorsement of potential strategies for dealing with bullying, and associations among SLPs' responses and specific demographic and practice-oriented variables. A survey was developed and mailed to 1000 school-based SLPs. Six vignettes describing episodes of physical, verbal, and relational bullying of hypothetical 10-year students who stutter were developed. Three vignettes described bullying specifically mentioning stuttering behaviors, while three described bullying without mentioning stuttering behavior. The data from 475 SLPs were analyzed. SLPs rated physical bullying as most serious and in need of intervention, followed by verbal bullying. Relational bullying was rated as not serious or in need of intervention. SLPs also responded to the likelihood of using strategies for dealing with bullying. Physical and verbal bullying elicited the use of "talking with the teacher", "working with school personnel", and "reassuring the child of his safety" strategies. Relational bullying elicited "ignore the problem" and "be more assertive" strategies. Correlations among variables are reported. The seriousness of physical and verbal bullying, likelihood of intervention, and the lack of knowledge about relational bullying is discussed.
Readers should be able to: (1) summarize the research describing the negative effects of three major types of bullying, (2) summarize the research describing bullying and children with communication disorders, especially stuttering, (3) report results of a survey of speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) perceptions of bullying in school-age children, (4) explain the perceived seriousness of the problem by SLPs and likelihood of intervention, and (5) describe the need for continued prevention and intervention activities for children who stutter.
本研究旨在调查言语语言病理学家(SLP)对欺凌问题的看法、对潜在处理策略的认可,以及他们对具体人口统计学和实践导向变量的反应之间的关联。
编制了一份问卷,并寄给了 1000 名学校的 SLP。设计了六个描述假设 10 岁口吃学生遭受身体、言语和关系欺凌的情景片段。其中三个片段具体描述了欺凌行为中提到的口吃行为,而另外三个则描述了没有提到口吃行为的欺凌。对 475 名 SLP 的数据进行了分析。
SLP 认为身体欺凌最为严重,需要干预,其次是言语欺凌。关系欺凌被认为不严重或不需要干预。SLP 还对处理欺凌问题的策略的可能性做出了回应。身体和言语欺凌引发了“与老师交谈”、“与学校人员合作”和“向孩子保证他的安全”等策略的使用。关系欺凌引发了“忽视问题”和“更自信”的策略。报告了变量之间的相关性。讨论了身体和言语欺凌的严重性、干预的可能性以及对关系欺凌缺乏了解的问题。
SLP 对欺凌问题的看法、对处理策略的认可,以及他们对不同类型欺凌的反应,都受到多种因素的影响。需要进一步的研究来了解 SLP 在处理欺凌问题时的知识、态度和实践。