• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尽管给予了充分的治疗剂量,但丙型肝炎基因 1 型合并晚期纤维化的患者仍存在低病毒学应答和高复发率。

Low virological response and high relapse rates in hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with advanced fibrosis despite adequate therapeutic dosing.

机构信息

Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2010 Oct;53(4):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.04.024. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.04.024
PMID:20619475
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The impact of fibrosis stage on chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment response was explored in CHARIOT, a study of high dose peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFNalpha-2a) induction therapy in treatment naïve genotype 1 infection.

METHODS

Eight hundred and ninety-six patients were randomised 1:1 to 360 microg (n=448) or 180 microg (n=448) PEG-IFNalpha-2a weekly with RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 12 weeks followed by 36 weeks of 180 microg PEG-IFNalpha-2a weekly plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day. Virological responses were assessed at week 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 (end of therapy), and 24 weeks following therapy (sustained virological response, SVR). As previously reported, there was no significant difference in SVR in the induction (53%) and standard (50%) arms, therefore the pooled study population was used for analysis of SVR and relapse.

RESULTS

A marked step-wise decline in SVR was evident by fibrosis stage: F0 (70%); F1 (60%); F2 (51%); F3 (31%); F4 (10%) (p<0.0001). Early virological responses were lower among F3/4 patients, including rapid virological response (RVR) (21% vs. 34% for F3/4 and F0-2, respectively) (p=0.0072), and the RVR positive predictive value was also lower (63% vs. 80%). Virological relapse rates were similar in early disease stages (F0, 16%; F1, 23%; F2, 26%), but increased markedly in advanced fibrosis (F3, 50%; F4, 80%) (p<0.0001). Cumulative PEG-IFNalpha-2a and ribavirin doses were similar among patients with F3/4 and F0-2 within treatment arms through week 4, 8, 12, and week 24.

CONCLUSIONS

Low virological response in hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with advanced fibrosis is not explained by inadequate cumulative PEG-IFN and ribavirin doses.

摘要

背景与目的

在 CHARIOT 研究中,我们探索了纤维化分期对慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗反应的影响,该研究为初治基因型 1 感染患者接受高剂量聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a(PEG-IFNalpha-2a)诱导治疗。

方法

896 例患者按 1:1 随机分为两组,分别接受 360μg(n=448)或 180μg(n=448)PEG-IFNalpha-2a 每周一次,联合利巴韦林 1000-1200mg/天,疗程 12 周,随后继续接受 180μg PEG-IFNalpha-2a 每周一次联合利巴韦林 1000-1200mg/天,疗程 36 周。在第 4、8、12、24、48 周(治疗结束时)和治疗结束后 24 周(持续病毒学应答,SVR)评估病毒学应答。正如之前报道的,诱导治疗(53%)和标准治疗(50%)组的 SVR 无显著差异,因此对聚集研究人群进行 SVR 和复发分析。

结果

纤维化分期明显影响 SVR:F0(70%);F1(60%);F2(51%);F3(31%);F4(10%)(p<0.0001)。F3/4 患者的早期病毒学应答较低,包括快速病毒学应答(RVR)(F3/4 和 F0-2 分别为 21%和 34%)(p=0.0072),RVR 阳性预测值也较低(63%和 80%)。在早期疾病阶段(F0,16%;F1,23%;F2,26%),病毒学复发率相似,但在晚期纤维化(F3,50%;F4,80%)显著增加(p<0.0001)。在治疗第 4、8、12 周和第 24 周,F3/4 和 F0-2 患者在治疗组中的累积 PEG-IFNalpha-2a 和利巴韦林剂量相似。

结论

在丙型肝炎基因型 1 患者中,晚期纤维化患者病毒学应答率低不能用累积 PEG-IFN 和利巴韦林剂量不足来解释。

相似文献

1
Low virological response and high relapse rates in hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with advanced fibrosis despite adequate therapeutic dosing.尽管给予了充分的治疗剂量,但丙型肝炎基因 1 型合并晚期纤维化的患者仍存在低病毒学应答和高复发率。
J Hepatol. 2010 Oct;53(4):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.04.024. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
2
Peginterferon alfa-2a relapse rates depend on weight-based ribavirin dosage in HCV-infected patients with genotype 1: results of a retrospective evaluation.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a的复发率取决于1型丙型肝炎病毒感染患者基于体重的利巴韦林剂量:一项回顾性评估结果
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(4):486-90. doi: 10.1080/00365520802647400.
3
Predictive value of rapid virological response and early virological response on sustained virological response in HCV patients treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎患者时,快速病毒学应答和早期病毒学应答对持续病毒学应答的预测价值
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jun;22(6):832-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04904.x.
4
Pegylated interferon α-2a plus ribavirin for decompensated hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: relationship between efficacy and cumulative dose.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗失代偿期丙型肝炎病毒相关性肝硬化:疗效与累积剂量的关系
Liver Int. 2014 Nov;34(10):1522-31. doi: 10.1111/liv.12417.
5
The use of different Peg-interferon alpha-2b regimens plus ribavirin in HCV-1b-infected patients after rapid virological response does not affect the achievement of sustained virological response.在快速病毒学应答后的丙型肝炎病毒1b型(HCV-1b)感染患者中,使用不同的聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b方案联合利巴韦林并不影响持续病毒学应答的实现。
J Viral Hepat. 2008 Apr;15(4):300-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2007.00944.x.
6
Lower-than-standard dose peg-IFN alfa-2a for chronic hepatitis C caused by genotype 2 and 3 is sufficient when given in combination with weight-based ribavirin.对于由2型和3型基因型引起的慢性丙型肝炎,低于标准剂量的聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a与基于体重的利巴韦林联合使用时就足够了。
J Viral Hepat. 2008 Sep;15(9):641-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.00999.x. Epub 2008 May 27.
7
A randomized study on Peg-interferon alfa-2a with or without ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C.一项关于聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合或不联合利巴韦林用于丙型肝炎复发的肝移植受者的随机研究。
J Hepatol. 2007 Jun;46(6):1009-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.12.017. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
8
Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 24 weeks in hepatitis C type 1 and 4 patients with rapid virological response.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗1型和4型丙型肝炎且病毒学应答快速的患者24周。
Gastroenterology. 2008 Aug;135(2):451-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.015. Epub 2008 May 27.
9
An inadequate dose of ribavirin is related to virological relapse by chronic hepatitis C patients treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin.聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2b 联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者,利巴韦林剂量不足与病毒学复发相关。
J Infect Chemother. 2012 Oct;18(5):689-97. doi: 10.1007/s10156-012-0396-5. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
10
Efficacy and safety of peg-IFN alfa-2a with ribavirin for the treatment of HCV/HIV coinfected patients who failed previous IFN based therapy.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗既往基于干扰素治疗失败的HCV/HIV合并感染患者的疗效与安全性。
J Clin Virol. 2007 Jan;38(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.09.009. Epub 2006 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulation of interferon signaling and HCV‑RNA replication by extracellular matrix.细胞外基质对干扰素信号和 HCV-RNA 复制的调节作用。
Int J Mol Med. 2018 Aug;42(2):957-965. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3693. Epub 2018 May 18.
2
Demographic profile, host, disease & viral predictive factors of response in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection at a tertiary care hospital in north India.印度北部一家三级护理医院慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染患者的人口统计学特征、宿主、疾病及病毒反应预测因素
Indian J Med Res. 2016 Mar;143(3):331-40. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.182624.
3
Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: Between prediction/prevention of outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
肝纤维化的非侵入性评估:介于结局的预测/预防与成本效益之间。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 28;22(4):1711-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i4.1711.
4
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2a has a better virologic response to antiviral therapy than HCV genotype 1b.丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)2a基因型对抗病毒治疗的病毒学应答比HCV 1b基因型更好。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):7446-56. eCollection 2015.
5
Comparison of first- and second-wave DAAs for HCV GT1: efficacy, safety, tolerability, and regimen complexity.丙型肝炎病毒基因1型(HCV GT1)的第一代和第二代直接抗病毒药物(DAAs)比较:疗效、安全性、耐受性及治疗方案复杂性
Hepatol Int. 2014 Jul;8(3):352-64. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9552-6. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
6
Interleukin-28B gene non-TT allele strongly predicts treatment failure for genotype 1 infected chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis: a case control study.白细胞介素-28B基因非TT等位基因强烈预示着1型感染的晚期纤维化慢性丙型肝炎患者治疗失败:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Mar 26;15:156. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0888-x.
7
Evaluation of the prognostic value of liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis C virus treated with triple or dual antiviral therapy: A prospective pilot study.丙型肝炎病毒患者接受三联或双联抗病毒治疗时肝硬度的预后价值评估:一项前瞻性初步研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 14;21(10):3013-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.3013.
8
Hepatitis C virus treatment in the 'real-world': how well do 'real' patients respond?“现实世界”中的丙型肝炎病毒治疗:“真实”患者的治疗效果如何?
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2014 Sep;4(3):214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
9
The hepatitis C genotype 1 paradox: cost per treatment is increasing, but cost per cure is decreasing.丙型肝炎基因型 1 悖论:治疗成本在增加,但治愈成本在降低。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan-Feb;29(1):46-8. doi: 10.1155/2015/216395.
10
Chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 treatment roadmap for resource constrained settings.资源受限环境下丙型肝炎病毒1型慢性肝炎的治疗路线图
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 14;21(6):1972-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1972.