University of Wuerzburg; Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Nov;78(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.06.358. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
The current pilot study was designed to investigate mechanisms of suppression of emotional and non-emotional words with Anderson's Think/No-Think paradigm using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). We found no differences in the suppression of negative, positive and neutral words on the behavioral level. Neurophysiological data, however, have shown more activation in right dlPFC and right vlPFC during attempts to suppress negative stimuli than during attempts to suppress neutral or positive stimuli. Our results thus provide further insights into the different mechanisms of voluntary thought suppression, recruited for the inhibition of thoughts of neutral, negative or positive content. Thereby, they provide a basis for continuing this line of research in a psychiatric sample of patients with Major Depressive Disorder and Panic Disorder, both disorders associated with persistent attempts to manipulate emotional memories.
本研究旨在采用安德森思维反思维定式范式,利用近红外光谱技术(fNIRS)研究情绪和非情绪词汇抑制的机制。我们在行为层面上未发现对负性、正性和中性词汇抑制的差异。然而,神经生理学数据显示,在尝试抑制负性刺激时,右背外侧前额叶和右侧额下回的活动增强,而在尝试抑制中性或正性刺激时则没有。因此,我们的结果进一步深入了解了不同的自愿思维抑制机制,这些机制被招募用于抑制中性、负性或正性内容的思维。这为在患有重度抑郁症和惊恐障碍的精神科患者样本中继续进行该研究提供了依据,这两种障碍都与持续试图操纵情绪记忆有关。