Harper University Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 29;56(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.045.
The CASES-PMS (Carotid Artery Stenting With Emboli Protection Surveillance-Post-Marketing Study) multicenter, prospective, single-arm, surveillance study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) when performed by physicians with varied experience in CAS utilizing a formal training program. Whether the excellent results achieved at 30 days would be sustained to 1 year was the subject of the current investigation.
Previously, the pivotal SAPPHIRE (Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection of Patients with High Risk for Endarterectomy) trial demonstrated that CAS was not inferior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) when performed by physicians experienced in carotid stenting.
High surgical-risk patients with de novo atherosclerotic or post-endarterectomy restenotic lesions in native carotid arteries were enrolled at participating centers. Inclusion and exclusion criteria matched those of the SAPPHIRE trial. The primary end point was a composite of 30-day major adverse events (MAE) including death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction.
A total of 1,492 patients were enrolled at 73 sites. The primary end point of 30-day MAE was 5.0%, meeting criteria for noninferiority to the prespecified objective performance criteria (OPC) established by the SAPPHIRE trial. The 1-year cumulative percentage of MAE was 12.5% by Kaplan-Meier analysis. All strokes to 30 days plus ipsilateral stroke between 31 and 360 days with CASES-PMS (5.4%) was similar to the rate seen with the SAPPHIRE trial stent cohort (4.9%). There were no significant differences in outcomes at 1 year by symptom status and high-risk status.
With the formalized training program utilized in this study, physicians with varied experience in carotid stenting can achieve similar short- and longer-term results to the highly experienced SAPPHIRE Investigators. (Carotid Artery Stenting With Emboli Protection Surveillance-Post-Marketing Study [CASES-PMS]; NCT00231231).
CASES-PMS(颈动脉支架置入术栓塞保护监测-上市后研究)是一项多中心、前瞻性、单臂、监测研究,旨在评估在接受过正式培训的经验各异的医师中进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的安全性和有效性。目前的研究旨在调查 30 天内获得的优异结果是否能持续到 1 年。
先前,关键性 SAPPHIRE(支架置入和血管成形术与高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者保护)试验表明,在经验丰富的颈动脉支架置入术医师中,CAS 并不逊于颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)。
在参与中心招募患有新出现的动脉粥样硬化或颈动脉内膜切除术再狭窄病变的高手术风险患者。纳入和排除标准与 SAPPHIRE 试验相匹配。主要终点是 30 天内主要不良事件(MAE)的综合指标,包括死亡、任何卒中或心肌梗死。
共有 1492 例患者在 73 个地点入组。30 天 MAE 的主要终点为 5.0%,符合 SAPPHIRE 试验预先设定的客观表现标准(OPC)的非劣效性标准。Kaplan-Meier 分析的 1 年累积 MAE 百分比为 12.5%。CASES-PMS 的所有 30 天内卒中加上同侧 31 至 360 天内卒中(5.4%)与 SAPPHIRE 试验支架队列(4.9%)的发生率相似。1 年内按症状状况和高危状况的结果无显著差异。
在本研究中使用的规范化培训计划,经验各异的颈动脉支架置入术医师可以获得与经验丰富的 SAPPHIRE 研究人员相似的短期和长期结果。(颈动脉支架置入术栓塞保护监测-上市后研究[CASES-PMS];NCT00231231)。