• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。

The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.

作者信息

Gray William A, Yadav Jay S, Verta Patrick, Scicli Andrea, Fairman Ronald, Wholey Mark, Hopkins L Nelson, Atkinson Richard, Raabe Rod, Barnwell Stanley, Green Richard

机构信息

Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Ft. Washington Avenue, Fifth Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.21359
PMID:18044758
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of carotid artery stenting with embolic protection has been practiced for over a decade in the United States, and increasingly so since carotid stenting received FDA approval in 2004. While there have been attempts at establishing predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting, they have generally been limited to single center experiences and/or multicenter retrospective surveys. This report examines predictors of outcomes in carotid stenting in the earliest and largest prospective multicenter neurologist-adjudicated experience in the United States post device approval.

METHODS

The Carotid Acculink/Accunet Post-Approval Trial to Uncover Unanticipated or Rare Events (CAPTURE) is a prospective, multi-center registry conducted to assess outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the noninvestigational setting following device approval for high surgical risk patients (symptomatic with > or =50% stenosis; asymptomatic > or =80% stenosis). A neurologist examined the patients before the procedure, at 24 hr and 30-days post-procedure. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30-days post-procedure. Strokes and neurological events suspected to be strokes were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Adjudication Committee (CEAC) using prespecified definitions. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine clinical, procedural, and anatomic predictors of endpoint outcomes.

RESULTS

Three thousand five hundred patients were enrolled at 144 sites by 353 physicians of varying specialty backgrounds and CAS experience. The 30-day primary endpoint event rate of death, stroke and MI was 6.3% [95% CI: 5.5-7.1%], and the rate of major stroke and death 2.9% [95% CI: 2.4-3.5]. Predictors of adverse outcomes included age, symptomatic patients, predilation prior to embolic protection device placement, time from symptoms to CAS procedure, and the use of multiple stents.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, carotid stenting is performed safely in patients with severe stenosis at high surgical risk, with best outcomes in younger asymptomatic patients. However, there are certain patient and procedural characteristics that are associated with poorer outcomes. In these patients, the risk of stenting should be considered vis-à-vis both the anticipated benefit as well as the alternative surgical and medical options.

摘要

背景

在美国,使用带有栓子保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术已开展了十多年,自2004年颈动脉支架置入术获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准后,其应用越来越广泛。虽然一直有人尝试确定颈动脉支架置入术预后的预测因素,但这些尝试通常局限于单中心经验和/或多中心回顾性调查。本报告在美国器械获批后最早且规模最大的前瞻性多中心神经病学专家判定的经验中,研究颈动脉支架置入术预后的预测因素。

方法

颈动脉Acculink/Accunet获批后试验以发现意外或罕见事件(CAPTURE)是一项前瞻性多中心注册研究,旨在评估在器械获批后针对高手术风险患者(有症状且狭窄≥50%;无症状且狭窄≥80%)在非研究环境下进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的预后。一名神经病学专家在手术前、术后24小时和30天对患者进行检查。主要终点是术后30天内死亡、任何卒中或心肌梗死的复合终点。卒中及疑似卒中的神经事件由独立的临床事件判定委员会(CEAC)根据预先设定的定义进行判定。进行逻辑回归分析以确定终点预后的临床、手术和解剖学预测因素。

结果

353名具有不同专业背景和CAS经验的医生在144个地点纳入了3500名患者。术后30天死亡、卒中和心肌梗死的主要终点事件发生率为6.3%[95%可信区间(CI):5.5 - 7.1%],主要卒中和死亡发生率为2.9%[95%CI:2.4 - 3.5]。不良预后的预测因素包括年龄、有症状的患者、在放置栓子保护装置之前进行预扩张、从出现症状到进行CAS手术的时间以及使用多个支架。

结论

总体而言,对于具有高手术风险的严重狭窄患者,颈动脉支架置入术实施安全,年轻无症状患者预后最佳。然而,存在某些与较差预后相关的患者和手术特征。对于这些患者,应权衡支架置入术的风险与预期获益以及替代的手术和药物选择。

相似文献

1
The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.
2
The CAPTURE registry: results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:批准后应用栓子保护装置行颈动脉支架置入术的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Feb 15;69(3):341-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21050.
3
CAPTURE 2 risk-adjusted stroke outcome benchmarks for carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection.使用远端栓塞保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术的 CAPTURE 2 风险调整后的卒中结果基准。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):576-83, 583.e1-583.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.064. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
4
Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries.来自 2 个前瞻性、多中心、高手术风险登记处的 6320 例患者的颈动脉支架置入术 30 天结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(3):159-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
5
Feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of direct carotid artery stent implantation with use of the FilterWire EZ Embolic Protection System.使用FilterWire EZ栓子保护系统进行直接颈动脉支架植入术的可行性、安全性及早期结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May 1;73(6):733-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21936.
6
The CAPTURE registry: analysis of strokes resulting from carotid artery stenting in the post approval setting: timing, location, severity, and type.CAPTURE注册研究:批准后环境下颈动脉支架置入术所致卒中的分析:时间、部位、严重程度及类型
Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):551-6; discussion 556-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181567a39.
7
Carotid artery revascularization in high surgical risk patients with the NexStent and the Filterwire EX/EZ: 1-year results in the CABERNET trial.使用NexStent和Filterwire EX/EZ对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉血管重建术:CABERNET试验的1年结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun 1;71(7):950-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21564.
8
Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results.高手术风险患者行远端保护下的颈动脉支架置入术:BEACH试验30天结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):503-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20689.
9
Carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients.外科手术高危患者的颈动脉支架置入术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):513-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20640.
10
Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry.颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整后30天结局:来自血管外科学会(SVS)血管登记处的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.039. Epub 2008 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug response testing for elective carotid artery stenting: Prevalence of non-response to aspirin and clopidogrel and influence on post-interventional occurrence of cerebral ischemia.选择性颈动脉支架置入术的药物反应测试:阿司匹林和氯吡格雷无反应的发生率及其对介入后脑缺血发生的影响。
Neuroradiol J. 2025 Aug 29:19714009251372360. doi: 10.1177/19714009251372360.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs. Carotid Stenting: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术的成本效益:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Stroke Res. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s12975-025-01347-z.
3
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting vs aggressive medical management on stroke or intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
经皮腔内血管成形术和支架置入与强化药物治疗对卒中和颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 9;13(1):7567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34663-1.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.第二代与第一代颈动脉支架的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819.
5
The clinical application of a scoring protocol to select endarterectomy or stenting for carotid artery stenosis.评分方案在颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术中的临床应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 18;12(1):4687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08807-8.
6
Safety and efficacy of symptomatic carotid artery stenting performed in an emergency setting.在紧急情况下进行症状性颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和疗效。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Jun;27(3):411-418. doi: 10.1177/1591019920977552. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
7
Poststent ballooning during transcarotid artery revascularization.支架球囊后扩张术在经颈动脉血运重建术中的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):2041-2049.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.071. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
8
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
9
Effect of aortic arch type on technical indicators in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.主动脉弓类型对接受颈动脉支架置入术患者技术指标的影响。
J Int Med Res. 2019 Feb;47(2):682-688. doi: 10.1177/0300060518807604. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Intervention or Best Medical Therapy?无症状性颈动脉狭窄:介入治疗还是最佳药物治疗?
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Sep 24;18(11):80. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0888-5.