Regional Medical Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2010 Jul-Aug;50(4):490-5. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2010.09055.
To determine the accuracy of medication reconciliation in an internal medicine clinic and to evaluate pharmacist interventions targeted at improving the accuracy of medication reconciliation.
Prospective case series.
Memphis, TN, from October 2007 to March 2008.
180 adults attending an internal medicine appointment.
On patient arrival, a nurse completed the medication reconciliation form. In Phase 1 of the study, a pharmacist randomly selected and reviewed a patient's medication reconciliation form, interviewed the patient, and verified information if indicated. A total of 90 forms were reviewed and compared to determine baseline medication reconciliation accuracy. Education interventions were held with the medical and nursing staff, targeting areas for improvement. In Phase 2 of the study, 90 additional medication reconciliation forms were reviewed in the same manner. Phase 1 and Phase 2 results were compared to evaluate differences in accuracy after the pharmacist's education interventions.
Accuracy of medication reconciliation forms and number of potentially significant errors at baseline and after pharmacist interventions.
In Phase 1, 14.4% of medication reconciliation forms were correct. The remaining forms contained 190 potentially significant errors. After the education interventions, 18.9% of medication reconciliation forms were correct and the others contained 139 potentially significant errors.
Medication reconciliation accuracy is poor. Although education interventions showed a trend toward improvement, continued education training for staff and patients is needed in addition to other interventions to optimize this process and prevent medication errors.
确定内科诊所中药物重整的准确性,并评估针对提高药物重整准确性的药师干预措施。
前瞻性病例系列研究。
田纳西州孟菲斯,2007 年 10 月至 2008 年 3 月。
180 名成年患者参加内科预约。
患者到达时,护士填写药物重整表。在研究的第一阶段,药剂师随机选择并审查患者的药物重整表,采访患者,并在需要时核实信息。共审查了 90 份表格,以确定药物重整准确性的基线。针对需要改进的领域,对医疗和护理人员进行了教育干预。在研究的第二阶段,以同样的方式审查了另外 90 份药物重整表。将第一阶段和第二阶段的结果进行比较,以评估药剂师教育干预后的准确性差异。
药物重整表的准确性和基线及药剂师干预后潜在严重错误的数量。
在第一阶段,14.4%的药物重整表是正确的。其余表格包含 190 个潜在的严重错误。经过教育干预后,18.9%的药物重整表是正确的,其余的表格包含 139 个潜在的严重错误。
药物重整的准确性较差。尽管教育干预显示出改善的趋势,但需要对员工和患者进行持续的教育培训,除了其他干预措施外,还需要优化这一过程,以防止药物错误。