• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培洛利昔(plerixafor)联合生长因子与环磷酰胺和生长因子相比,更有利于自体造血干细胞的动员。

Growth factor and patient-adapted use of plerixafor is superior to CY and growth factor for autologous hematopoietic stem cells mobilization.

机构信息

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425-6350, USA.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Apr;46(4):523-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.170. Epub 2010 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1038/bmt.2010.170
PMID:20622909
Abstract

The ideal method to mobilize autologous hematopoietic stem cells (AHSCs) in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma remains to be determined. The use of plerixafor, added to growth factor, may overcome the limitations to the use of growth factor mobilization without chemotherapy. We developed and validated a cost-based decision-making algorithm that uses the CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood on the fourth day of G-CSF administration and the target CD34+ cell count for the specific patient to decide on the use of plerixafor (MUSC algorithm). We compared this approach (MA cohort) with a historical cohort of patients undergoing mobilization with CY 2000 mg/m(2) followed by G-CSF and GM-CSF (CY cohort). Fifty individuals are included in the MA cohort and 81 in the CY cohort. The mobilization failure rate was 2% in the MA cohort vs 22% in the CY cohort (P=0.01). Fewer patients in the MA cohort than in the CY cohort had infectious complications during mobilization requiring hospitalization (2 vs 30% P<0.01). There was significant shortening in the median number of days between starting mobilization and undergoing transplantation in the MA cohort (14 vs 43 days, P<0.01). In conclusion, growth factor and patient-adapted use of plerixafor provides safer hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and faster access to AHSC transplantation.

摘要

在淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤患者中动员自体造血干细胞 (AHSCs) 的理想方法仍有待确定。添加培洛昔福的生长因子的使用可能会克服不使用化疗进行生长因子动员的限制。我们开发并验证了一种基于成本的决策算法,该算法使用 G-CSF 给药第 4 天外周血中的 CD34+细胞计数和特定患者的目标 CD34+细胞计数来决定是否使用培洛昔福(MUSC 算法)。我们将这种方法(MA 队列)与接受 CY 2000mg/m²后进行 G-CSF 和 GM-CSF 动员的历史队列患者(CY 队列)进行了比较。MA 队列中包括 50 名个体,CY 队列中包括 81 名个体。MA 队列的动员失败率为 2%,而 CY 队列为 22%(P=0.01)。MA 队列中需要住院治疗的动员期间感染并发症的患者少于 CY 队列(2%比 30%,P<0.01)。MA 队列中从开始动员到接受移植的中位天数明显缩短(14 天比 43 天,P<0.01)。总之,生长因子和患者适应性使用培洛昔福可提供更安全的造血干细胞动员,并更快地进行 AHSC 移植。

相似文献

1
Growth factor and patient-adapted use of plerixafor is superior to CY and growth factor for autologous hematopoietic stem cells mobilization.培洛利昔(plerixafor)联合生长因子与环磷酰胺和生长因子相比,更有利于自体造血干细胞的动员。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Apr;46(4):523-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.170. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
2
Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.在新型治疗时代,使用普乐沙福和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员多发性骨髓瘤患者的外周血干细胞,与使用低剂量环磷酰胺和G-CSF进行动员相比,具有更高的疗效,但成本显著更高。
J Clin Apher. 2013 Oct;28(5):359-67. doi: 10.1002/jca.21280. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.超越 CD34+ 细胞剂量:外周血造血干细胞动员方法(粒细胞集落刺激因子[G-CSF]、G-CSF 加plerixafor 或环磷酰胺 G-CSF/粒细胞-巨噬细胞[GM]-CSF)对集落形成单位-GM 数量、植入和第 100 天造血移植物功能的影响。
Transfusion. 2011 Sep;51(9):1995-2000. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03085.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
4
Cost and clinical analysis of autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with G-CSF and plerixafor compared to G-CSF and cyclophosphamide.G-CSF 和培洛昔康与 G-CSF 和环磷酰胺相比用于自体造血干细胞动员的成本和临床分析。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 May;17(5):729-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.08.018. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
5
Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.与培洛昔康和 G-CSF 相比,新型疗法治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者中,中剂量环磷酰胺和 G-CSF 动员 PBSC 的疗效相当,但成本更低。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Oct;48(10):1279-84. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.52. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
6
Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.培洛昔福联合粒细胞集落刺激因子与安慰剂联合粒细胞集落刺激因子动员多发性骨髓瘤且外周血 CD34+细胞计数低的患者中的 CD34+造血干细胞:一项随机试验的亚组分析结果。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Oct;18(10):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
7
Peripheral blood CD34+ cell monitoring after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an algorithm for the pre-emptive use of plerixafor.环磷酰胺和粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗后的外周血CD34+细胞监测:普乐沙福预先使用的算法
Leuk Lymphoma. 2014 Feb;55(2):331-6. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.802783. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
Plerixafor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma previously failing mobilization with G-CSF with or without chemotherapy for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: the Austrian experience on a named patient program.培洛昔福联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)治疗淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者:在自体造血干细胞动员时,G-CSF 联合或不联合化疗失败后的奥地利经验
Transfusion. 2011 May;51(5):968-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02896.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
9
Development and validation of a decision-making algorithm to guide the use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.开发和验证一种决策算法,以指导使用plerixafor 进行自体造血干细胞动员。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Jan;46(1):64-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.78. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
10
Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide, sequential granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, and scheduled commencement of leukapheresis in 225 patients undergoing autologous transplantation.对225例接受自体移植的患者采用中剂量环磷酰胺、序贯应用粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子和粒细胞集落刺激因子进行外周血祖细胞动员,并安排开始白细胞分离术。
Transfusion. 2007 Nov;47(11):2153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01440.x.

引用本文的文献

1
An evidence-based and risk-adapted GSF versus GSF plus plerixafor mobilization strategy to obtain a sufficient CD34 cell yield in the harvest for autologous stem cell transplants.一种基于证据且根据风险调整的粒细胞集落刺激因子(GSF)与粒细胞集落刺激因子加普乐沙福动员策略,以在自体干细胞移植的采集物中获得足够的CD34细胞产量。
Transl Oncol. 2024 Jan;39:101811. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101811. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
2
Prospective Comparative Study of Etoposide plus G-CSF versus G-CSF Alone, Followed by Risk-Adapted Plerixafor for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: CAtholic REsearch Network for Multiple Myeloma Study (CAREMM-2001).依托泊苷联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)与单纯G-CSF用于新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血干细胞动员的前瞻性比较研究,随后采用风险适应性普乐沙福:天主教多发性骨髓瘤研究网络(CAREMM-2001)研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;15(19):4783. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194783.
3
Efficacy, safety, and cost of mobilization strategies in multiple myeloma: a prospective, observational study.多发性骨髓瘤动员策略的疗效、安全性及成本:一项前瞻性观察性研究
Haematologica. 2023 Aug 1;108(8):2249-2254. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.282269.
4
Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.造血干细胞动员方案在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022 Mar 22;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-02802-6.
5
Machine learning-based scoring models to predict hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in allogeneic donors.基于机器学习的评分模型预测异基因供者造血干细胞动员。
Blood Adv. 2022 Apr 12;6(7):1991-2000. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005149.
6
Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide +/- Plerixafor versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor +/- Plerixafor in the Lenalidomide Era.多发性骨髓瘤中的干细胞动员:来那度胺时代环磷酰胺 +/- 培洛昔芬与粒细胞集落刺激因子 +/- 培洛昔芬的安全性和疗效比较。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Jul;27(7):590.e1-590.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
7
Utilization of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple myeloma: a Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus statement.造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的应用:梅奥多发性骨髓瘤分层与风险适应性治疗(mSMART)共识声明。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Mar;54(3):353-367. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0264-8. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Improved progression-free and event-free survival in myeloma patients undergoing PBSCH receiving a cyclophosphamide + G-CSF regimen than G-CSF alone.与单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)相比,接受环磷酰胺+G-CSF方案的自体骨髓干细胞移植(PBSCH)骨髓瘤患者的无进展生存期和无事件生存期得到改善。
Int J Hematol. 2018 May;107(5):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s12185-018-2408-4. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Upfront use of plerixafor and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: efficacy and analysis of risk factors associated with poor stem cell collection efficiency.在多发性骨髓瘤患者中预先使用普乐沙福和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)进行干细胞动员:疗效及与干细胞采集效率低下相关的危险因素分析
Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 May;58(5):1123-1129. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1239261. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.在多发性骨髓瘤中,用于干细胞动员的初治普乐沙福加粒细胞集落刺激因子与环磷酰胺加粒细胞集落刺激因子的疗效和成本分析研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Apr;51(4):546-52. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.322. Epub 2016 Jan 4.