PsychoTropical Research, Queensland, Australia.
Mov Disord. 2010 Sep 15;25(12):1780-90. doi: 10.1002/mds.23220.
This review focuses on new data from recent publications concerning how compounding interactions between different thermoregulatory pathways influence the development of hyperthermia and/or neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), and the fundamental issue of the presumed causal role of antipsychotic drugs. The formal criteria for substantiating cause-effect relationships in medical science, established by Hill, are applied to NMS and, for comparison, also to malignant hyperthermia and serotonin toxicity. The risk of morbidities related to hyperthermia is reviewed from human and experimental data: temperatures in excess of 39.5°C cause physiological and cellular dysfunction and high mortality. The most temperature-sensitive elements of neural cells are mitochondrial and plasma membranes, in which irreversible changes occur around 40°C. Temperatures of up to 39°C are "normal" in mammals, so, the term hyperthermia should be reserved for temperatures of 39.5°C or greater. The implicitly accepted presumption that NMS is a hypermetabolic and hyperthermic syndrome is questionable and does not explain the extensive morbidity in the majority of cases, where the temperature is less than 39°C. The thermoregulatory effects of dopamine and acetylcholine are outlined, especially because they are probably the main pathways by which neuroleptic drugs might affect thermoregulation. It is notable that even potent antagonism of these mechanisms rarely causes temperature elevation and that multiple mechanisms, including the acute phase response, stress-induced hyperthermia, drugs effects, etc., involving compounding interactions, are required to precipitate hyperthermia. The application of the Hill criteria clearly supports causality for drugs inducing both MH and ST but do not support causality for NMS.
这篇综述主要关注最近出版物中关于不同体温调节途径之间的复合相互作用如何影响高热和/或恶性神经阻滞剂综合征(NMS)的发展,以及抗精神病药物假定因果作用的基本问题。应用希氏(Hill)建立的医学科学中因果关系的正式标准来验证 NMS,同时,也对恶性高热和 5-羟色胺毒性进行了比较。从人类和实验数据中回顾了与高热相关的发病率的风险:体温超过 39.5°C 会导致生理和细胞功能障碍,以及高死亡率。神经细胞中对温度最敏感的是线粒体和质膜,在 40°C 左右会发生不可逆转的变化。在哺乳动物中,高达 39°C 的温度是“正常”的,因此,高热的术语应保留用于 39.5°C 或更高的温度。隐含地接受 NMS 是一种高代谢和高热综合征的假设是值得怀疑的,并且不能解释大多数情况下的广泛发病率,其中温度低于 39°C。概述了多巴胺和乙酰胆碱的体温调节作用,特别是因为它们可能是神经阻滞剂药物影响体温调节的主要途径。值得注意的是,即使这些机制的强力拮抗作用很少引起体温升高,并且需要涉及复合相互作用的多种机制,包括急性期反应、应激诱导的高热、药物作用等,才能引发高热。希氏标准的应用清楚地支持了引发 MH 和 ST 的药物的因果关系,但不支持 NMS 的因果关系。