• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[直肠手术骶管麻醉期间使用感觉测量法评估镇痛效果]

[Evaluation of the adequacy of analgesia using sensometry method during sacral anesthesia in proctological operations].

作者信息

Nasibova E M

出版信息

Klin Khir. 2010 May(5):21-3.

PMID:20623974
Abstract

Adequacy of epidural-sacral anesthesia in proctological operations was studied. Sensometry occupies a special place among the methods, estimating the sacral anesthesia adequacy, owing the advantage of possibility for quantitative estimation of such an important index, as a patient reaction on external irritants, including such of a pain. Sensometry, according to A. K. Sangaylo method, using portative apparatus "Nil - 3" was conducted in 50 patients while proctological operations performance for estimation of various variants of sacral anesthesia efficacy. There was established, that sensometry constitutes the most informative quantitative method of estimation of the anesthesia adequacy.

摘要

研究了直肠手术中硬膜外-骶管麻醉的充分性。在评估骶管麻醉充分性的方法中,感觉测量法占据特殊地位,因为它具有对患者对外界刺激(包括疼痛刺激)的反应这一重要指标进行定量评估的优势。根据A.K.桑盖洛方法,使用便携式“Nil - 3”仪器对50例接受直肠手术的患者进行感觉测量,以评估骶管麻醉效果的各种变体。结果表明,感觉测量法是评估麻醉充分性最具信息量的定量方法。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of the adequacy of analgesia using sensometry method during sacral anesthesia in proctological operations].[直肠手术骶管麻醉期间使用感觉测量法评估镇痛效果]
Klin Khir. 2010 May(5):21-3.
2
[Experiences with sacral anesthesia in combination with morphine analgesia].[骶管麻醉联合吗啡镇痛的经验]
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1989;14(5):291-7.
3
[Use of epidural-sacral anesthesia and long-term morphine analgesia in proctological patients].
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1986 May;136(5):131-2.
4
The analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia and intravenous opioid analgesia after radical gastrectomy.根治性胃切除术后肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞与胸段硬膜外镇痛和静脉阿片类药物镇痛的镇痛效果比较。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):507-13. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318297fcee. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
5
Epidural analgesia for pain relief in thoracic surgery.用于胸外科手术镇痛的硬膜外镇痛
J Med Assoc Thai. 2000 Apr;83(4):358-63.
6
Combined spinal-epidural analgesia vs. intermittent bolus epidural analgesia for pain relief after major abdominal surgery. A prospective, randomised, double-blind clinical trial.腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛与间歇性推注硬膜外镇痛用于腹部大手术后疼痛缓解的比较。一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Feb;62(2):255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01642.x. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
7
Anesthetic and analgesic effects in patients undergoing a lumbar laminectomy of spinal, epidural or a combined spinal-epidural block with the addition of morphine.在接受腰椎板切除术的患者中,脊髓、硬膜外或联合脊髓-硬膜外阻滞时加入吗啡的麻醉和镇痛效果。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Mar;19(3):406-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.04.042. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
8
The effect of epidural vs intravenous analgesia for posterior spinal fusion surgery.硬膜外镇痛与静脉镇痛用于后路脊柱融合手术的效果比较
Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 Dec;14(12):1009-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01387.x.
9
[Feasibility of sensometry in evaluating the efficacy of postoperative analgesia].
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 1986 May-Jun(3):44-7.
10
Comparison of epidural butorphanol versus epidural morphine in postoperative pain relief.硬膜外注射布托啡诺与硬膜外注射吗啡用于术后镇痛的比较。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Feb;22(4):371-6.