Kida M Y, Kudoh H
Department of Anatomy, Sapporo Medical College, Japan.
Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1991 Mar;67(6):449-55. doi: 10.2535/ofaj1936.67.6_449.
In one case accompanied by congenital partial absence of the pectoralis major muscle the sternalis muscle was examined to confirm its innervation by means of analysis of intramuscular nerve distribution. It was proved that the sternalis muscle was supplied only by the pectoral nerves even in the case of sternalis in direct contact with the proper thoracic wall. These findings as well as the results of Ura (1937) and Morita (1944) favor the interpretation presented by Eisler (1901), in which the sternalis muscle was described as being supplied only by the pectoral nerves. However, the problem of double innervation of the sternalis requires continued discussion because the relationships between the pectoral nerves and the branches of the intercostal nerves or extramural nerves (Yamada & Mannen, 1985; Kodama et al., 1986) have not yet been resolved. The precise genesis of the sternalis muscle should be also examined though it has already been proved to be derived from the pectoralis muscle group including the subcutaneous trunci muscle.
在1例伴有先天性胸大肌部分缺如的病例中,通过分析肌内神经分布对胸骨肌进行检查以确认其神经支配。结果证明,即使在胸骨肌与胸壁直接接触的情况下,胸骨肌也仅由胸神经支配。这些发现以及Ura(1937年)和Morita(1944年)的研究结果支持Eisler(1901年)提出的观点,即胸骨肌仅由胸神经支配。然而,胸骨肌双重神经支配的问题仍需继续探讨,因为胸神经与肋间神经分支或壁外神经之间的关系(Yamada和Mannen,1985年;Kodama等人,1986年)尚未得到解决。尽管胸骨肌已被证明起源于包括皮下躯干肌在内的胸肌组,但仍应研究其确切起源。