Middlesex University, UK.
Scand J Psychol. 2011 Apr;52(2):168-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00838.x.
Antonovsky's sense of coherence (SOC) theory relates to the adaptive capacity of humans. In response to Antonovsky's call to study the sense of coherence concept using methods other than his orientation to life questionnaire, and to further test the application of the concept, qualitative research methods were employed. Using thematic analysis this study investigated how sense of coherence theory applied when mapped onto descriptions by 20 mental health service users of how they deal with problems that they face in their lives. The thematic analysis revealed that sense of coherence theory mapped effectively onto the interview transcripts. The analysis identified various factors that can be considered to be general resistance resources in the sense of coherence model. It also revealed distinctions between concrete and relationship orientated problem solving that led to new insights into how mechanisms of sense of coherence theory may operate. The findings suggest that sense of coherence strength may be split into coping and adaptive capacity for concrete problems and coping and adaptive capacity for relationship oriented problems. This highlights the possibility that SOC strength is not an overall adaptive capacity measure which can be applied with equal effectiveness to all challenges/problems experienced in life.
Antonovsky 的 意义感(SOC)理论与人类的适应能力有关。为响应 Antonovsky 的呼吁,本研究采用了生活取向问卷以外的方法来研究意义感概念,并进一步检验这一概念的应用,因此使用了定性研究方法。本研究通过主题分析,调查了当把意义感理论映射到 20 名心理健康服务使用者对他们如何应对生活中面临的问题的描述上时,该理论是如何应用的。主题分析表明,意义感理论有效地映射到访谈记录中。该分析确定了可以被视为意义感模型中一般抵抗资源的各种因素。它还揭示了具体问题和关系导向问题解决之间的区别,从而深入了解意义感理论的机制如何运作。研究结果表明,意义感的强度可以分为具体问题的应对和适应能力以及关系导向问题的应对和适应能力。这突出表明,SOC 强度可能不是一种整体的适应能力衡量标准,不能以同样的有效性应用于生活中遇到的所有挑战/问题。