Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):680-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.005.
Using optical coherence tomography, we assessed the proportion of uncovered struts at 6-month follow-up in zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), specifically Endeavor (Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, California) stents, and identical bare-metal stents (BMS) implanted in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents implanted in STEMI have been associated with delayed healing and incomplete strut coverage. ZES are associated with a more complete and uniform strut coverage in stable patients, but whether this holds true also after STEMI is unknown.
Forty-four patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI were randomized to ZES or BMS (3:1 randomization). Angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography follow-up was conducted at 6 months and clinical follow-up at 1 year. All images were analyzed by an independent core laboratory that was blind to stent assignments.
There were no differences between ZES and BMS in percentage of uncovered struts (median: 0.00% [interquartile range (IQR): 0.00% to 1.78%] vs. 1.98% [IQR: 0.21% to 7.33%], p = 0.13), maximum length of uncovered segments (0.00 [IQR: 0.00 to 1.19] mm vs. 1.38 [IQR: 0.65 to 3.30] mm, p = 0.10), percentage of malapposed struts (0.00% [IQR: 0.00% to 0.23%] vs. 0.15% [IQR: 0.00% to 5.81%], p = 0.16), and maximum length of malapposed segments (0.00 [IQR: 0.00 to 0.67] mm vs. 0.33 [IQR: 0.00 to 2.55] mm, p = 0.20). Neointimal response was similar between ZES and BMS (332 [IQR: 240 to 429] microm vs. 186 [IQR: 136 to 348] microm, p = 0.99) and evenly distributed. No late acquired malapposition was observed in both groups. There were no deaths, myocardial infarction, or stent thromboses at 1 year.
This optical coherence tomography study found no difference in strut coverage and similar vessel response to ZES, when compared with identical BMS, implanted during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients. (Six-Month Coverage and Vessel Wall Response of the Zotarolimus Drug-Eluting Stent Implanted in AMI Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography [OCTAMI]; NCT00704561).
通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中雷帕霉素洗脱支架(ZES)(即 Endeavor 支架,美敦力心血管,加利福尼亚州圣罗莎)和相同的金属裸支架(BMS)在 6 个月随访时的未覆盖支架比例。
STEMI 中植入的西罗莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架与延迟愈合和不完全支架覆盖有关。ZES 在稳定患者中与更完整和均匀的支架覆盖相关,但在 STEMI 后是否也如此尚不清楚。
44 例 STEMI 患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),随机分为 ZES 或 BMS 组(3:1 随机分组)。在 6 个月时进行血管造影、血管内超声和 OCT 随访,并在 1 年时进行临床随访。所有图像均由独立的核心实验室进行分析,该实验室对支架分配情况不知情。
ZES 和 BMS 之间未覆盖支架的比例(中位数:0.00%[四分位距(IQR):0.00%至 1.78%] vs. 1.98%[IQR:0.21%至 7.33%],p = 0.13)、最大未覆盖节段长度(0.00[IQR:0.00 至 1.19]mm vs. 1.38[IQR:0.65 至 3.30]mm,p = 0.10)、贴壁不良支架比例(0.00%[IQR:0.00%至 0.23%] vs. 0.15%[IQR:0.00%至 5.81%],p = 0.16)和最大贴壁不良节段长度(0.00[IQR:0.00 至 0.67]mm vs. 0.33[IQR:0.00 至 2.55]mm,p = 0.20)相似。ZES 和 BMS 的新生内膜反应相似(332[IQR:240 至 429]μm vs. 186[IQR:136 至 348]μm,p = 0.99),且均匀分布。两组均未观察到迟发性贴壁不良。在 1 年时,无死亡、心肌梗死或支架血栓形成。
这项光学相干断层扫描研究发现,与相同的 BMS 相比,ZES 在急性 STEMI 患者中进行直接 PCI 时,在支架覆盖率和血管反应方面没有差异。(OCTAMI:急性心肌梗死中应用光学相干断层扫描评估 Zotarolimus 药物洗脱支架的 6 个月支架覆盖率和血管壁反应;NCT00704561)。