• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在调强放疗(IMRT)中,由于 X 射线的传输时间延长,会有大量剂量损失,但高强度射线(high-LET radiations)则不会。

Significant dose can be lost by extended delivery times in IMRT with x rays but not high-LET radiations.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2457-65. doi: 10.1118/1.3425792.

DOI:10.1118/1.3425792
PMID:20632556
Abstract

PURPOSE

To experimentally simulate IMRT delivery using two human cell models in vitro and test the hypothesis that a loss in effective dose resulting from the prolongation of megavoltage x-ray treatment delivery time would be greatly reduced in corresponding IMRT simulations using higher-LET radiation.

METHODS

The effect of prolonging the delivery time of a treatment fraction was investigated in vitro using human PC-3 prostate and HGL21 glioblastoma tumor cell lines. Cells were irradiated with x rays from a conventional linear accelerator or with neutrons from a clinical d(48.5)+Be radiotherapy beam and maintained at 37 degrees C throughout. The delivery time for six closely spaced doses, simulating six multiple-port segments, was varied from acute to 60 min for x-ray irradiation, and acute to 120 min for neutron irradiation. Cell survival was measured following summed doses for the six segments of 0.5-6 Gy for x rays and 0.16-2 Gy for neutrons, covering the most likely range of dose per fraction used in clinical radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Prolonging x-ray delivery time (from initiation of segment 1 to initiation of segment 6) from 5 to 45 min resulted in a loss in effective total dose (in equivalent 2 Gy multifraction treatments) of 5.6% in the PC-3 cell line and 11.7% in the HGL21 cell line. More clinically common prolongations of 5-30 and 5-15 min resulted in effective dose reductions of 3.8% and 1.7% for PC-3, and 7.3% and 2.9% for HGL21. A loss of less than 0.5% in effective dose was observed for prolongations up to 45 min of similarly effective neutron irradiation of PC-3 and HGL21 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged delivery times of photon fractions could have a significant impact on treatment outcome especially for tumors with a low alpha/beta ratio and short repair halftime. These effects are significant at delivery times commonly associated with IMRT and are variable with cell type. X-ray IMRT should therefore always be planned to minimize dose-fraction delivery time. However, if IMRT treatments are delivered with high-LET radiation, this considerably reduces the dependence of the biological effect on fraction delivery time even out to 2 h.

摘要

目的

通过体外培养的两种人类细胞模型来模拟调强放射治疗(IMRT)的实施,并验证假设,即由于延长兆伏级 X 射线治疗的实施时间而导致的有效剂量损失,在使用更高传能线密度(LET)的放射治疗模拟中会大大减少。

方法

使用人前列腺癌细胞系 PC-3 和胶质母细胞瘤细胞系 HGL21,在体外研究延长治疗剂量分割的实施时间的影响。细胞用常规线性加速器的 X 射线或临床 d(48.5)+Be 放射治疗束的中子照射,并在整个过程中保持在 37℃。6 个紧密间隔的剂量的实施时间从急性(照射开始至第 1 个分割结束)延长至 60 分钟,用于 X 射线照射,从急性延长至 120 分钟,用于中子照射。对于 X 射线的 0.5-6 Gy 和中子的 0.16-2 Gy 六个分段的总和剂量,测量细胞存活情况,涵盖临床放射治疗中最常见的剂量分割。

结果

从第 1 个分割开始至第 6 个分割开始,将 X 射线的传输时间从 5 分钟延长至 45 分钟,导致 PC-3 细胞系的有效总剂量(相当于 2 Gy 多分割治疗)损失 5.6%,HGL21 细胞系损失 11.7%。在 PC-3 中,更常见的 5-30 分钟和 5-15 分钟的延长导致有效剂量减少 3.8%和 1.7%,在 HGL21 中,有效剂量减少 7.3%和 2.9%。对于 PC-3 和 HGL21 细胞的同样有效的中子照射,延长至 45 分钟,观察到有效剂量的损失小于 0.5%。

结论

光子剂量分割的延长传输时间可能会对治疗结果产生重大影响,特别是对于α/β比值低和修复半衰期短的肿瘤。这些影响在与 IMRT 相关的常见传输时间中很显著,并且随细胞类型而异。因此,X 射线 IMRT 应始终计划将剂量分割的传输时间最小化。然而,如果使用高 LET 射线进行 IMRT 治疗,即使在 2 小时的时间内,这也会大大降低生物学效应对剂量分割传输时间的依赖性。

相似文献

1
Significant dose can be lost by extended delivery times in IMRT with x rays but not high-LET radiations.在调强放疗(IMRT)中,由于 X 射线的传输时间延长,会有大量剂量损失,但高强度射线(high-LET radiations)则不会。
Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2457-65. doi: 10.1118/1.3425792.
2
In vitro study of cell survival following dynamic MLC intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose delivery.动态多叶准直器调强放射治疗剂量输送后细胞存活的体外研究。
Med Phys. 2007 Apr;34(4):1514-20. doi: 10.1118/1.2712044.
3
Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: a note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).延长分次照射时间对肿瘤控制的影响:对调强放射治疗(IMRT)的一点警示
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Oct 1;57(2):543-52. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00499-1.
4
Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: a volumetric dose measurement study.剂量分割对呼吸运动诱导的调强放疗(IMRT)剂量交付误差的剂量学和放射生物学影响:一项容积剂量测量研究
Med Phys. 2006 May;33(5):1380-7. doi: 10.1118/1.2192908.
5
Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.调强放射治疗与三维适形放射治疗在前列腺癌治疗中的剂量学及放射生物学模型比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 May 1;59(1):267-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.024.
6
Impact of prolonged fraction dose-delivery time modeling intensity-modulated radiation therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma cell killing.延长分次剂量输送时间模型的调强放射治疗对肝癌细胞杀伤的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar 14;11(10):1452-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i10.1452.
7
Recovery from sublethal damage during intermittent exposures in cultured tumor cells: implications for dose modification in radiosurgery and IMRT.培养的肿瘤细胞在间歇性照射期间从亚致死损伤中的恢复:对放射外科和调强放疗中剂量修正的意义。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Aug 1;59(5):1484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.039.
8
Dose rate dependence of the relative biological effectiveness of 103Pd for continuous low dose rate irradiation of BA1112 rhabdomyosarcoma cells in vitro relative to acute exposures.相对于急性照射,¹⁰³Pd对BA1112横纹肌肉瘤细胞进行体外连续低剂量率照射时相对生物效应的剂量率依赖性。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2005 Sep;81(9):689-99. doi: 10.1080/09553000500401551.
9
The RBE for mouse skin irradiated with 3-MeV neutrons: single and fractionated doses.3兆电子伏中子辐照小鼠皮肤的相对生物效应:单次和分次剂量
Radiat Res. 1983 Jul;95(1):130-41.
10
Pelvic nodal dose escalation with prostate hypofractionation using conformal avoidance defined (H-CAD) intensity modulated radiation therapy.使用适形避让定义的(H-CAD)调强放射治疗对前列腺低分割放疗时盆腔淋巴结剂量递增。
Acta Oncol. 2006;45(6):717-27. doi: 10.1080/02841860600781781.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction 6D motion for stereotactic body radiation therapy of spinal metastases: influence of treatment time.评估脊柱转移立体定向体部放射治疗的分次内和分次间 6D 运动:治疗时间的影响。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Aug 30;16(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01892-5.
2
Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy special debate: All head and neck cancer patients with intact tumors/nodes should have scheduled adaptive replanning performed at least once during the course of radiotherapy.三学科协作放射治疗专题辩论:所有肿瘤/淋巴结完整的头颈癌患者在放疗过程中均应安排至少一次适应性重新计划。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 May;20(5):7-11. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12587. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
3
Effects of variations in overall treatment time on the clonogenic survival of V79-4 cells: Implications for radiosurgery.
总体治疗时间变化对V79 - 4细胞克隆形成存活的影响:对放射外科的启示
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2019;6(1):1-9.
4
Radiation repair models for clinical application.用于临床应用的辐射修复模型。
Br J Radiol. 2019 Jan;92(1093):20180070. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180070. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
5
Application of the concept of biologically effective dose (BED) to patients with Vestibular Schwannomas treated by radiosurgery.生物等效剂量(BED)概念在接受放射外科治疗的前庭神经鞘瘤患者中的应用。
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2013;2(4):257-271.
6
Impact of Decaying Dose-rate in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.伽玛刀放射外科中剂量率衰减的影响。
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2013;2(3):251-253.
7
Radiation therapy-induced metastasis: radiobiology and clinical implications.放疗诱导的转移:放射生物学及其临床意义。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2018 Apr;35(4):223-236. doi: 10.1007/s10585-017-9867-5. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Dosimetric Comparison and Evaluation of 4 Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Techniques for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.4种立体定向体部放射治疗技术治疗前列腺癌的剂量学比较与评估
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Apr;16(2):238-245. doi: 10.1177/1533034616682156. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
9
Will intrafraction repair have negative consequences on extreme hypofractionation in prostate radiation therapy?分次内修复会对前列腺放射治疗中的大分割放疗产生负面影响吗?
Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1056):20150588. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150588. Epub 2015 Oct 9.