Department Pediatrics and Human Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Int J Toxicol. 2010 Jul;29(4):344-57. doi: 10.1177/1091581810371384.
Chemicals are known to be associated with birth defects, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, immunological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. In response to recent reviews of limitations of current concepts and techniques for toxicity testing, this commentary challenges the paradigm that chemicals are directly responsible for DNA damage in the genomic-nuclear DNA in relevant cells of the human body. This challenge is not that mutations do not play roles in human-inherited or somatic diseases but that chemical exposures bring about disease end points by epigenetic mechanisms or by alterations in adult stem cell numbers in utero (ie, the Barker hypothesis) or postnatally, by selecting preexisting mutated cells. Classic concepts, that is, multistage, multimechanism process of carcinogenesis, stem cell theory of cancer, and newer and ignored concepts, such as cancer stem cells and cell-cell communication, will be used to support the view that the toxic effect of chemicals is mediated by nonmutagenic mechanisms at human relevant exposures.
化学品已知会导致出生缺陷、癌症、心血管疾病、免疫、生殖和神经紊乱。针对当前毒性测试概念和技术的局限性的最新综述,本评论质疑了这样一种范式,即化学物质直接导致人体相关细胞中的基因组-核 DNA 中的 DNA 损伤。这一挑战并非在于突变在人类遗传性或体细胞疾病中不起作用,而是化学暴露通过表观遗传机制或通过改变宫内(即 Barker 假说)或出生后成年干细胞数量来带来疾病终点,从而选择预先存在的突变细胞。经典概念,即癌症发生的多阶段、多机制过程、癌症干细胞理论,以及更新和被忽视的概念,如癌症干细胞和细胞间通讯,将被用来支持这样一种观点,即化学物质的毒性作用是通过人类相关暴露的非突变机制介导的。