Suppr超能文献

复杂碎裂电图与迷走神经介导的心房颤动中的房颤巢

Complex fractionated electrograms and AF nests in vagally mediated atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Oh Seil, Kong Hyoun-Joong, Choi Eue-Keun, Kim Hee Chan, Choi Yun-Shik

机构信息

Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Dec;33(12):1497-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02834.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation targeting of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) is one of the techniques used for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The ablation of sites showing a high-frequency spectral component (HFC) during sinus rhythm, known as AF nests, has been introduced as an adjunct to conventional ablation. Known locations of some AF nests are similar to CFAE sites. However, it has not been systematically evaluated whether these two targets represent the same foci. The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical locations of these sites using an animal model of vagally mediated AF.

METHODS

Five anesthetized open-chest dogs were evaluated. Atrial electrograms were obtained epicardially. AF was induced by burst atrial pacing with 20 Hz during vagal stimulation. A total of 15 sites (eight sites in right atrium and seven sites in left atrium) were evaluated in each animal. The CFAE was determined during AF according to the electrogram patterns. After sinus conversion, real-time spectrum analysis was used for AF nest assessment at the same location.

RESULTS

The CFAE was observed at the high and mid sulcus terminalis areas, pulmonary vein antrum, and mid portion of the coronary sinus. Among them, only 60% of the CFAE sites showed HFC during sinus rhythm. In addition, some of the non-CFAE sites (22%) showed HFC during sinus rhythm.

CONCLUSION

The CFAE sites were not the same as the AF nests in this animal model of vagally mediated AF. Therefore, these two types of ablation methods appear to target different substrates of AF.

摘要

背景

针对复杂碎裂心房电图(CFAEs)的导管消融是用于心房颤动(AF)消融的技术之一。在窦性心律期间显示高频频谱成分(HFC)的部位的消融,即所谓的房颤巢,已被引入作为传统消融的辅助手段。一些房颤巢的已知位置与CFAE部位相似。然而,尚未系统评估这两个靶点是否代表相同的病灶。本研究的目的是使用迷走神经介导的房颤动物模型比较这些部位的解剖位置。

方法

对五只麻醉开胸犬进行评估。心外膜记录心房电图。在迷走神经刺激期间,通过20Hz的短阵心房起搏诱发房颤。每只动物共评估15个部位(右心房8个部位,左心房7个部位)。根据房颤期间的电图模式确定CFAE。窦性心律转复后,在同一位置使用实时频谱分析评估房颤巢。

结果

在终末沟的高、中部区域、肺静脉前庭和冠状窦中部观察到CFAE。其中,只有60%的CFAE部位在窦性心律期间显示HFC。此外,一些非CFAE部位(22%)在窦性心律期间显示HFC。

结论

在这个迷走神经介导的房颤动物模型中,CFAE部位与房颤巢不同。因此,这两种消融方法似乎针对房颤的不同基质。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验