Laboratory for the Study of Learning and Development, National Centre for Scientific Research, UMR 5022, University of Burgundy, and Department of Anaesthesia Resuscitation, Dijon National University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Med Educ. 2010 Jul;44(7):716-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03708.x.
What is the best way to train medical students early so that they acquire basic skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation as effectively as possible? Studies have shown the benefits of high-fidelity patient simulators, but have also demonstrated their limits. New computer screen-based multimedia simulators have fewer constraints than high-fidelity patient simulators. In this area, as yet, there has been no research on the effectiveness of transfer of learning from a computer screen-based simulator to more realistic situations such as those encountered with high-fidelity patient simulators.
We tested the benefits of learning cardiac arrest procedures using a multimedia computer screen-based simulator in 28 Year 2 medical students. Just before the end of the traditional resuscitation course, we compared two groups. An experiment group (EG) was first asked to learn to perform the appropriate procedures in a cardiac arrest scenario (CA1) in the computer screen-based learning environment and was then tested on a high-fidelity patient simulator in another cardiac arrest simulation (CA2). While the EG was learning to perform CA1 procedures in the computer screen-based learning environment, a control group (CG) actively continued to learn cardiac arrest procedures using practical exercises in a traditional class environment. Both groups were given the same amount of practice, exercises and trials. The CG was then also tested on the high-fidelity patient simulator for CA2, after which it was asked to perform CA1 using the computer screen-based simulator. Performances with both simulators were scored on a precise 23-point scale.
On the test on a high-fidelity patient simulator, the EG trained with a multimedia computer screen-based simulator performed significantly better than the CG trained with traditional exercises and practice (16.21 versus 11.13 of 23 possible points, respectively; p<0.001).
Computer screen-based simulation appears to be effective in preparing learners to use high-fidelity patient simulators, which present simulations that are closer to real-life situations.
如何尽早有效地培训医学生,使他们获得心肺复苏的基本技能?研究表明,高保真患者模拟器具有优势,但也显示出了其局限性。新的基于计算机屏幕的多媒体模拟器比高保真患者模拟器的限制更少。在这一领域,迄今为止,还没有研究基于计算机屏幕的模拟器的学习迁移到更真实的情况(如高保真患者模拟器中遇到的情况)的有效性。
我们在 28 名二年级医学生中测试了使用多媒体计算机屏幕为基础的模拟器学习心脏骤停程序的效果。在传统复苏课程结束前,我们比较了两组学生。实验组(EG)首先被要求在计算机屏幕为基础的学习环境中学习在心脏骤停场景(CA1)中执行适当的程序,然后在另一个心脏骤停模拟(CA2)中在高保真患者模拟器上进行测试。当 EG 在计算机屏幕为基础的学习环境中学习 CA1 程序时,对照组(CG)则在传统课堂环境中积极地继续进行心脏骤停程序的实践练习。两组都接受了相同数量的练习、实践和试验。然后 CG 在高保真患者模拟器上进行 CA2 测试,之后要求其在计算机屏幕为基础的模拟器上进行 CA1 操作。使用精确的 23 分制对两个模拟器的表现进行评分。
在高保真患者模拟器的测试中,使用多媒体计算机屏幕为基础的模拟器进行培训的 EG 组的表现明显优于使用传统练习和实践进行培训的 CG 组(EG 组 23 分中得分为 16.21 分,CG 组得分为 11.13 分;p<0.001)。
基于计算机屏幕的模拟似乎在为学习者使用高保真患者模拟器做好准备方面是有效的,因为后者提供了更接近现实生活情况的模拟。