Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jul;21(7):747-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01882.x.
The fit of implant-supported single-tooth Lava zirconia assemblies was investigated in this study. The implant-abutment interface, the interface between the metallic and the zirconia portion of the abutment and the interface between Lava abutments and copings were evaluated. The adaptation of titanium abutments to implants and Lava copings was investigated as a control.
Twenty implants were randomly assigned and connected to Lava abutments (group 1) or titanium abutments (group 2). All specimens were subjected to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of the fixture/abutment fit. Afterwards, specimens were luted to Lava copings and subjected to a SEM evaluation of the marginal external adaptation of the abutments with the copings. Finally, the samples were embedded in resin, sectioned and subjected to SEM analysis of the following interfaces; group 1: titanium/zirconia interface (between the constitutive components of the Lava abutment) and the zirconia/zirconia interface (between the Lava abutment and the coping); group 2: the titanium/zirconia interface (between the titanium abutment and the Lava coping). Non-parametric analysis of variance and a post hoc test were used for statistical analysis.
Significant differences emerged in the cement thickness between titanium and zirconia components of the Lava abutments as compared with the thickness measured at the interface between Lava copings and the abutments investigated. No differences were found in cement thickness between Lava copings and the two different abutments.
When Lava abutments are used, the most critical cement thickness is the internal interface between its titanium and zirconia components. Lava coping adaptation for both Lava and titanium abutments is within the clinical acceptable range.
本研究旨在研究种植体支持的单颗 Lava 氧化锆修复体的适合性。评估了种植体-基台界面、基台金属与氧化锆部分之间的界面以及 Lava 基台与修复体之间的界面。作为对照,研究了钛基台与种植体和 Lava 修复体的适合性。
将 20 个种植体随机分配并连接到 Lava 基台(第 1 组)或钛基台(第 2 组)。所有样本均进行了种植体/基台适合性的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析。然后,将样本粘接到 Lava 修复体上,并对基台与修复体之间的边缘外部适合性进行 SEM 评估。最后,将样本嵌入树脂中,进行切片,并对以下界面进行 SEM 分析:第 1 组:钛/氧化锆界面(Lava 基台组成部分之间)和氧化锆/氧化锆界面(Lava 基台和修复体之间);第 2 组:钛/氧化锆界面(钛基台和 Lava 修复体之间)。使用非参数方差分析和事后检验进行统计分析。
与所研究的 Lava 修复体与基台之间的界面处测量的厚度相比,Lava 基台的钛和氧化锆组件之间的水泥厚度存在显著差异。Lava 修复体与两种不同基台之间的水泥厚度无差异。
当使用 Lava 基台时,最关键的水泥厚度是其钛和氧化锆组件之间的内部界面。Lava 修复体与 Lava 和钛基台的适合性均在临床可接受范围内。