Lando H A, McGovern P G
University of Minnesota, Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Minneapolis 55455.
Addict Behav. 1991;16(3-4):111-21. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(91)90003-z.
The present investigation undertook a large-scale replication of an apparently successful group cohesion manipulation reported by Etringer, Gregory, and Lando (1984)l A 2 x 2 factorial design was initiated in which subjects were to be randomly assigned to enriched or standard cohesion and to satiation or nicotine fading. However, subject resistance to the satiation technique necessitated the abandoning of this part of the experimental procedure. Subjects assigned to nicotine fading (enriched or standard cohesion) included 184 women and 169 men. In contrast to the Etringer et al. study, there was virtually no evidence of a treatment effect on either group cohesion scores or abstinence outcome. Future work might attempt to establish more powerful manipulations of cohesion, which could then be applied especially to groups that fail to coalesce on their own.
本研究对埃特林格、格雷戈里和兰多(1984年)报告的一项明显成功的群体凝聚力操纵进行了大规模复制。启动了一项2×2析因设计,其中受试者将被随机分配到强化或标准凝聚力组,以及饱腹感或尼古丁递减组。然而,受试者对饱腹感技术的抵触使得这部分实验程序不得不放弃。被分配到尼古丁递减组(强化或标准凝聚力)的受试者包括184名女性和169名男性。与埃特林格等人的研究不同,几乎没有证据表明该治疗对群体凝聚力得分或戒断结果有影响。未来的工作可能会尝试建立更有效的凝聚力操纵方法,然后特别应用于那些无法自行凝聚的群体。