• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术项目分析:在质量、潜力和成本模型的应用方面比较护理专业和其他大学专业。

Analysis of academic programs: comparing nursing and other university majors in the application of a quality, potential and cost model.

机构信息

Adult Advanced Practice Nursing, Yale School of Nursing, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.

出版信息

J Prof Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(4):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.11.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.11.002
PMID:20637441
Abstract

Nursing is often considered expensive in the cost analysis of academic programs. Yet nursing programs have the power to attract many students, and the national nursing shortage has resulted in a high demand for nurses. Methods to systematically assess programs across an entire university academic division are often dissimilar in technique and outcome. At a small, private, Midwestern university, a model for comprehensive program assessment, titled the Quality, Potential and Cost (QPC) model, was developed and applied to each major offered at the university through the collaborative effort of directors, chairs, deans, and the vice president for academic affairs. The QPC model provides a means of equalizing data so that single measures (such as cost) are not viewed in isolation. It also provides a common language to ensure that all academic leaders at an institution apply consistent methods for assessment of individual programs. The application of the QPC model allowed for consistent, fair assessments and the ability to allocate resources to programs according to strategic direction. In this article, the application of the QPC model to School of Nursing majors and other selected university majors will be illustrated.

摘要

护理学在学术项目的成本分析中通常被认为是昂贵的。然而,护理项目有吸引众多学生的能力,而且全国范围内的护士短缺导致对护士的需求很高。系统评估整个大学学术部门的项目的方法在技术和结果上往往不同。在一所位于中西部的小型私立大学中,开发并应用了一种名为“质量、潜力和成本 (QPC)”的综合项目评估模型,通过主任、主席、院长和负责学术事务的副校长的协作,对大学提供的每个专业进行评估。QPC 模型提供了一种均衡数据的方法,因此不会孤立地看待单一指标(如成本)。它还提供了一种通用语言,以确保机构中的所有学术领导都采用一致的方法来评估各个项目。QPC 模型的应用允许进行一致、公平的评估,并能够根据战略方向为项目分配资源。本文将举例说明 QPC 模型在护理学院专业和其他选定的大学专业中的应用。

相似文献

1
Analysis of academic programs: comparing nursing and other university majors in the application of a quality, potential and cost model.学术项目分析:在质量、潜力和成本模型的应用方面比较护理专业和其他大学专业。
J Prof Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(4):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.11.002.
2
A model to identify direct costs of nursing education: the Colorado experience.
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 2005 Summer;9(4):155-62.
3
Contribution margin modeling by academic unit: an evidence-based approach to programmatic decision making.按学术单位进行的边际贡献建模:一种基于证据的项目决策方法。
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 2005 Summer;9(4):149-53.
4
A budget model to determine the financial health of nursing education programs in academic institutions.一种用于确定学术机构中护理教育项目财务健康状况的预算模型。
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 2005 Summer;9(4):143-7.
5
Leading through collaboration: a regional academic/service partnership that works.通过合作引领:一个行之有效的区域学术/服务伙伴关系。
Nurs Outlook. 2007 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.01.002.
6
The demise of nursing education at a major research university.一所主要研究型大学护理教育的衰落。
Nurs Outlook. 2004 Nov-Dec;52(6):304-10. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.08.005.
7
Adapting the CAUSN accreditation process for emerging models of nursing education in Canada.使加拿大护理教育新模式适应CAUSN认证流程。
Can J Nurs Res. 1999 Dec;31(3):129-37.
8
A replication study of priorities and attitudes of two nursing programs' communities of interest: an appreciative inquiry.两个护理项目的利益相关者群体的优先级和态度的复制研究:一项积极探究。
J Prof Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;23(5):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.01.023.
9
Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study.韩国护理博士教育的师资、学生、课程和资源质量:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
10
Evaluating teaching effectiveness in nursing education: an Iranian perspective.评估护理教育中的教学效果:伊朗视角
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Jul 27;5:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-29.