Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Nanoscale. 2010 Mar;2(3):335-42. doi: 10.1039/b9nr00287a. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
Nanoparticles are the cornerstone of nanotechnology. Their crystal structure and relation to shape are still open problems despite a lot of advances in the field. The classical theory of nanoparticle stability predicts that for sizes <1.5-2 nm the icosahedral structure should be the most stable, then between around 2-5 nm, the decahedral shape should be the most stable. Beyond that, face-centered-cubic (FCC) structures will be the predominant phase. However, in the experimental side, icosahedral (I(h)) and decahedral (D(h)) particles can be observed much beyond the 5 nm limit. In fact, it is possible to find I(h) and D(h) particles even in the mesoscopic range. Conversely, it is possible to find FCC particles with a size <1.5 nm. In this paper we review a number of the mechanisms proposed in the literature that allow the stabilization of nanoparticles. Some of the mechanisms are very interrelated and it becomes difficult to distinguish between them.
纳米粒子是纳米技术的基石。尽管该领域取得了许多进展,但它们的晶体结构和形状关系仍然是悬而未决的问题。纳米粒子稳定性的经典理论预测,对于尺寸 <1.5-2nm 的纳米粒子,二十面体结构应该是最稳定的,然后在大约 2-5nm 之间,应该是最稳定的二十面体形状。在此之后,面心立方(FCC)结构将是主要相。然而,在实验方面,二十面体(I(h))和二十面体(D(h))颗粒可以在超过 5nm 的极限之外观察到。事实上,甚至在介观范围内也可以发现 I(h)和 D(h)颗粒。相反,也有可能发现尺寸 <1.5nm 的 FCC 颗粒。在本文中,我们回顾了文献中提出的一些允许稳定纳米粒子的机制。其中一些机制非常相关,很难将它们区分开来。