Leroy F, Lablanche J M, Bauters C, Bertrand M E
Service de cardiologie B, hôpital Cardiologique, université de Lille II.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1991 Apr;84(4):485-91.
The aim of this study was to identify the parameters of exercise stress testing with a predictive value of cardiac death after myocardial infarction and to determine their importance with respect to clinical and coronary angiographic data. Three hundred and three patients, average age 48.9 +/- 9.2 years, surviving primary myocardial infarction, underwent a symptoms-limited exercise stress test and coronary angiography four to seven weeks after infarction. The average follow-up period was 48 +/- 22 months. Eighteen patients (5.9%) were lost to follow-up. Global mortality was 11.6% (33/285) and cardiac mortality was 8.8% (25/285) including 14 sudden deaths (56%) and 17 deaths during the first three years of follow-up (68%). A univariable analysis identified the following parameters of exercise stress testing as predictive of cardiac mortality. The duration of exercise, the maximal rate-pressure product, inconclusive test, the maximal heart rate, and occurrence of supraventricular arrhythmias. Only the last two parameters remained significant after a discriminant analysis and their combination with clinical variables (age and ventricular fibrillation during the hospital phase) enabled accurate classification of 79% of patients, which was significantly better than when clinical features were used alone (p 0.01). On the other hand, adding the data of coronary angiography (number of diseases vessels, absence of an Ergometrine test) only moderately improved this score (82%, NS). This study suggests that the results of the post-infarction exercise stress test enables identification of patients with a low or, on the contrary, with a high risk of cardiac death. The prognostic value of this investigation is better than simple clinical evaluation, especially in stable or asymptomatic patients. In this selected group of patients, coronary angiography did not provide additional prognostic information.
本研究的目的是确定心肌梗死后具有心脏死亡预测价值的运动负荷试验参数,并确定它们相对于临床和冠状动脉造影数据的重要性。303例存活的首次心肌梗死患者,平均年龄48.9±9.2岁,在梗死后4至7周接受了症状限制性运动负荷试验和冠状动脉造影。平均随访期为48±22个月。18例患者(5.9%)失访。总死亡率为11.6%(33/285),心脏死亡率为8.8%(25/285),其中包括14例猝死(56%)和随访前三年中的17例死亡(68%)。单变量分析确定了以下运动负荷试验参数可预测心脏死亡率:运动持续时间、最大心率血压乘积、试验结果不确定、最大心率以及室上性心律失常的发生。经过判别分析后,只有最后两个参数仍然具有显著性,并且它们与临床变量(年龄和住院期间的心室颤动)相结合能够准确分类79%的患者,这明显优于单独使用临床特征时的分类效果(p<0.01)。另一方面,加入冠状动脉造影数据(病变血管数量、无麦角新碱试验)仅适度提高了这一评分(82%,无显著性差异)。本研究表明,梗死后运动负荷试验结果能够识别心脏死亡风险低或高的患者。这项检查的预后价值优于简单的临床评估,尤其是在病情稳定或无症状的患者中。在这一选定的患者群体中,冠状动脉造影并未提供额外的预后信息。