University of East Anglia, UK.
J Peasant Stud. 2010;37(3):485-512. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.494372.
This paper notes the prominence of self-help groups (SHGs) within current anti-poverty policy in India, and analyses the impacts of government- and NGO-backed SHGs in rural North Karnataka. It argues that self-help groups represent a partial neoliberalisation of civil society in that they address poverty through low-cost methods that do not challenge the existing distribution of power and resources between the dominant class and the labouring class poor. It finds that intra-group savings and loans and external loans/subsidies can provide marginal economic and political gains for members of the dominant class and those members of the labouring classes whose insecure employment patterns currently provide above poverty line consumption levels, but provide neither material nor political gains for the labouring class poor. Target-oriented SHG catalysts are inattentive to how the social relations of production reproduce poverty and tend to overlook class relations and socio-economic and political differentiation within and outside of groups, which are subject to interference by dominant class local politicians and landowners.
本文指出自助团体(SHG)在印度当前扶贫政策中的突出地位,并分析了政府和非政府组织支持的 SHG 在北卡纳塔克邦农村地区的影响。本文认为,自助团体代表了公民社会的部分新自由主义化,因为它们通过低成本的方法来解决贫困问题,这些方法并没有挑战主导阶级和劳动阶级贫困之间现有的权力和资源分配。本文发现,内部储蓄和贷款以及外部贷款/补贴可以为主导阶级和那些目前不稳定就业模式提供高于贫困线消费水平的劳动阶级成员提供边缘经济和政治收益,但对劳动阶级贫困者既没有提供物质收益也没有提供政治收益。以目标为导向的 SHG 催化剂没有注意到生产关系如何再生产贫困,并且往往忽视了阶级关系以及群体内外的社会经济和政治分化,这些关系受到主导阶级当地政治家和地主的干扰。