Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Center on Gender Equity and Health, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):2535-2549. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30648-8. Epub 2019 May 30.
Restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities are replicated and reinforced in health systems, contributing to gender inequalities in health. In this Series paper, we explore how to address all three through recognition and then with disruptive solutions. We used intersectional feminist theory to guide our systematic reviews, qualitative case studies based on lived experiences, and quantitative analyses based on cross-sectional and evaluation research. We found that health systems reinforce patients' traditional gender roles and neglect gender inequalities in health, health system models and clinic-based programmes are rarely gender responsive, and women have less authority as health workers than men and are often devalued and abused. With regard to potential for disruption, we found that gender equality policies are associated with greater representation of female physicians, which in turn is associated with better health outcomes, but that gender parity is insufficient to achieve gender equality. We found that institutional support and respect of nurses improves quality of care, and that women's empowerment collectives can increase health-care access and provider responsiveness. We see promise from social movements in supporting women's reproductive rights and policies. Our findings suggest we must view gender as a fundamental factor that predetermines and shapes health systems and outcomes. Without addressing the role of restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities within and outside health systems, we will not reach our collective ambitions of universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals. We propose action to systematically identify and address restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities in health systems.
限制性别规范和性别不平等在卫生系统中得到复制和加强,导致卫生方面的性别不平等。在本系列论文中,我们通过识别和颠覆性解决方案来探讨如何解决这三个问题。我们使用交叉女权主义理论来指导我们的系统评价、基于生活经验的定性案例研究以及基于横断面和评估研究的定量分析。我们发现,卫生系统强化了患者的传统性别角色,忽视了卫生方面的性别不平等,卫生系统模式和基于诊所的方案很少对性别问题有反应,女性作为卫生工作者的权力比男性小,而且往往被低估和虐待。关于可能的颠覆性因素,我们发现,性别平等政策与更多女性医生的代表性相关,而这又与更好的健康结果相关,但性别均等不足以实现性别平等。我们发现,机构支持和对护士的尊重可以提高护理质量,妇女赋权集体可以增加获得保健的机会和提供者的响应能力。我们从支持妇女生殖权利和政策的社会运动中看到了希望。我们的研究结果表明,我们必须将性别视为一个基本因素,它决定和塑造卫生系统和结果。如果不解决卫生系统内外限制性别规范和性别不平等的问题,我们将无法实现全民健康覆盖和可持续发展目标的共同目标。我们建议采取行动,系统地确定和解决卫生系统中的限制性别规范和性别不平等问题。
Glob Public Health. 2014
Front Public Health. 2025-8-20
Hum Resour Health. 2025-8-19
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025-7-10