Cao Yong-ping, Wen Li-cheng, Li Jun, Yang Xin, Lu Hong-zhang, Liu Zhen-ning
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking University, the First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Apr 15;48(8):601-5.
To evaluate the effects of cementless revising cup or acetabular reinforcement cages for reconstructing the massive acetabular deficiency.
From September 2001 to September 2008, 22 loosening acetabular cases (24 hips) were revised using cementless revising cup or acetabular reinforcement cases for reconstructing massive bone defect after particulate bone grafting. There were 2 cases (2 hips) using Lima cementless revising cup, 2 cases (2 hips) using Kerboull ring, and 18 cases (20 hips) using restoration GAP cages. Six cases (6 hips) were male, and 16 cases (18 hips) were female. The mean age was 62 years old (34 - 79 years old). Septic loosening was in 2 cases (2 hips), and aseptic loosening in 20 cases (22 hips). The mean follow-up was 48 months (18 - 84 months).
There was no clinical or radiological evidence of loosening for the revising acetabular components at the last follow-up point. The mean Harris hip score was improved significantly from 56 points (44 - 75) before revision to 89 points (78 - 94) at the last follow-up after revision. Excellent and good rate was 95.5% (21/22 cases). The average abduction angle of the three types of acetabular reconstructive cages were 50.1 degrees (39.0 degrees - 66.0 degrees), and almost all cases of the hip rotation center were restored after revision surgery. At the last follow-up, the reinforcement cages were no immigration and breakup, and there was no radiolucent line around the acetabular components. The bone graft integrated well into surrounding acetabular bone.
The method of revising the massive acetabular bone defect by cementless revising cup and acetabular reinforcement cages restores the normal hip rotation center, supplies the primary stability of the revising component, and protects the bone graft from mechanical overload during its revascularization phase, which is a reliable method for revising the massive acetabular deficiency after total hip arthroplasty.
评估非骨水泥翻修髋臼杯或髋臼加强笼重建髋臼大块骨缺损的效果。
2001年9月至2008年9月,对22例髋臼松动病例(24髋)采用非骨水泥翻修髋臼杯或髋臼加强笼重建颗粒骨移植后髋臼大块骨缺损。其中使用Lima非骨水泥翻修髋臼杯2例(2髋),使用Kerboull环2例(2髋),使用恢复GAP笼18例(20髋)。男性6例(6髋),女性16例(18髋)。平均年龄62岁(34 - 79岁)。感染性松动2例(2髋),无菌性松动20例(22髋)。平均随访48个月(18 - 84个月)。
末次随访时,翻修髋臼组件无临床或影像学松动证据。Harris髋关节评分均值从翻修前的56分(44 - 75分)显著提高至翻修后末次随访时的89分(78 - 94分)。优良率为95.5%(21/22例)。三种髋臼重建笼的平均外展角度为50.1度(39.0度 - 66.0度),翻修术后几乎所有病例的髋关节旋转中心均得以恢复。末次随访时,加强笼无移位及断裂,髋臼组件周围无透亮线。骨移植与髋臼周围骨融合良好。
采用非骨水泥翻修髋臼杯和髋臼加强笼修复髋臼大块骨缺损的方法可恢复正常髋关节旋转中心,提供翻修组件的初始稳定性,并在骨移植血管化阶段保护其免受机械性过载,是全髋关节置换术后髋臼大块骨缺损翻修的可靠方法。