Shen Shu-hong, Guo Qi-hao, Wang Shao-shi, Zhao Qian-hua, Hong Zhen
Department of Neurology, Branch of Shanghai No.1 Hospital, Shanghai 200081, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 May 4;90(17):1167-70.
To understand the nature of subjective memory complaints through comparative study of depression status of patients with subjective memory complaints and mild cognitive impairment.
A total of 214 patients were assessed with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, the Geriatric Depression Scale and some neuropsychological tests. Among them, 76 were of subjective memory complaints (SMC), 74 amnestic mild cognitive impairment-single domain (aMCI-s) and 64 amnestic mild cognitive impairment-multiple domain (aMCI-m).
According to CESD, 31% of the patients had symptoms of depression. The ratios were 30%, 24% and 39% in SMC, aMCI-s and aMCI-m groups respectively. GDS study showed that 43% of the patients had symptoms of depression. The ratios were 47%, 30% and 53% in SMC, aMCI-s and aMCI-m groups respectively. The ratio in SMC group fell between the other two groups. The total score of CESD (12 +/- 10) or GDS (11 +/- 6) of the SMC group, reflecting the severity of depression, fell between aMCI-s (CESD: 11 +/- 8, GDS: 9 +/- 5) and (CESD: 15 +/- 11, GDS: 12 +/- 7) groups. There was no significant difference between them in comparison with either aMCI-s or aMCI-m group (P > 0.05). But the total score of CESD or GDS was significantly different between aMCI-m and aMCI-s groups (P < 0.05). The depression status was worse in aMCI-m group than that in aMCI-s group.
There is no significant discrepancy in the incidence and severity of depression between SMC and aMCI groups. It indicates that depressive mood is not the specific cause of SMC.
通过比较主观记忆障碍患者与轻度认知障碍患者的抑郁状态,了解主观记忆障碍的本质。
采用流调中心用抑郁量表(CES-D)、老年抑郁量表及一些神经心理学测试对214例患者进行评估。其中,主观记忆障碍(SMC)患者76例,遗忘型轻度认知障碍单领域(aMCI-s)患者74例,遗忘型轻度认知障碍多领域(aMCI-m)患者64例。
根据CESD,31%的患者有抑郁症状。SMC组、aMCI-s组和aMCI-m组的比例分别为30%、24%和39%。GDS研究显示,43%的患者有抑郁症状。SMC组、aMCI-s组和aMCI-m组的比例分别为47%、30%和53%。SMC组的比例介于其他两组之间。反映抑郁严重程度的SMC组CESD总分(12±10)或GDS总分(11±6)介于aMCI-s组(CESD:11±8,GDS:9±5)和(CESD:15±11,GDS:12±7)组之间。与aMCI-s组或aMCI-m组相比,它们之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。但aMCI-m组和aMCI-s组之间的CESD或GDS总分有显著差异(P<0.05)。aMCI-m组的抑郁状态比aMCI-s组更差。
SMC组和aMCI组在抑郁发生率和严重程度上无显著差异。这表明抑郁情绪不是SMC的特定病因。