Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S1W16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec;40(12):1154-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq103. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
We analyzed the efficacy of additional antiandrogens as second- and third-line treatments after the failure of initial androgen deprivation monotherapy.
This retrospective study included 53 patients with advanced prostate cancer initially treated with androgen deprivation monotherapy alone. An antiandrogen was added to androgen deprivation monotherapy as the second-line treatment after the failure of the initial androgen deprivation monotherapy. Another antiandrogen, estrogen or steroid was given as the third-line treatment after the second-line treatment failed.
The initial androgen deprivation monotherapy was effective in all 53 patients for a median of 9.6 months. Thirty-three (62.3%) patients showed a prostate-specific antigen response to the second-line treatment for a median of 10.7 months. Of the 46 patients who received the third-line treatment, 16 (34.8%) showed a prostate-specific antigen response for a median of 6.0 months. Patients who responded to the second-line treatment had a significantly higher cancer-specific survival rate than those without a response. In multivariate analysis, a nadir prostate-specific antigen of 4.0 ng/ml or greater during androgen deprivation monotherapy and prostate-specific antigen doubling time of less than 10 months after androgen deprivation monotherapy failure were independent risk factors for prostate cancer death after androgen deprivation monotherapy failure, with hazards ratios of 5.59 and 8.00, respectively. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 100%, 65.0% and 15.5% in patients with 0, 1 and 2 risk factors, respectively (P = 0.047).
In this study, the second- and third-line treatments were effective for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Nadir prostate-specific antigen during androgen deprivation monotherapy and prostate-specific antigen doubling time just after the failure of androgen deprivation monotherapy are factors that can predict the prognosis.
我们分析了在初始雄激素剥夺单药治疗失败后,作为二线和三线治疗的附加抗雄激素药物的疗效。
这项回顾性研究纳入了 53 例初始接受雄激素剥夺单药治疗的晚期前列腺癌患者。初始雄激素剥夺单药治疗失败后,加用抗雄激素药物作为二线治疗。二线治疗失败后,给予另一种抗雄激素、雌激素或类固醇作为三线治疗。
53 例患者的初始雄激素剥夺单药治疗均有效,中位时间为 9.6 个月。33 例(62.3%)患者对二线治疗有前列腺特异性抗原反应,中位时间为 10.7 个月。在 46 例接受三线治疗的患者中,16 例(34.8%)有前列腺特异性抗原反应,中位时间为 6.0 个月。对二线治疗有反应的患者的癌症特异性生存率显著高于无反应的患者。多因素分析显示,雄激素剥夺单药治疗期间的最低前列腺特异性抗原值≥4.0ng/ml 和雄激素剥夺单药治疗失败后前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间<10 个月是雄激素剥夺单药治疗失败后前列腺癌死亡的独立危险因素,风险比分别为 5.59 和 8.00。无、1 个和 2 个危险因素的患者 5 年癌症特异性生存率分别为 100%、65.0%和 15.5%(P=0.047)。
在这项研究中,二线和三线治疗对晚期前列腺癌患者有效。雄激素剥夺单药治疗期间的最低前列腺特异性抗原值和雄激素剥夺单药治疗失败后前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间是可以预测预后的因素。