Dr Fooke Laboratorien, Neuss, Germany.
Lupus. 2010 Nov;19(13):1527-33. doi: 10.1177/0961203310375265. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
Autoantibodies targeting the proliferating cell nuclear antigen have been considered as a specific biomarker for systemic lupus erythematosus, and were historically identified by indirect immunofluorescence and then confirmed by other more specific immunoassays. Our objective was to investigate the anti-PCNA immune response in various disease conditions. Unselected sera referred to a clinical diagnostic laboratory and other sera from various diseases cohorts and controls were tested for anti-PCNA antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), line immunoassay (LIA) and an addressable laser bead assay (ALBIA) using full-length human proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Two out of 2500 sequential, unselected sera (0.07%) referred to a diagnostic laboratory for autoantibody analysis showed a proliferating cell nuclear antigen-like staining pattern. Good agreement was found between ELISA, ALBIA and LIA. At cut-off values resulting in 100% specificity, 52.5% (ELISA), 42.5% (ALBIA) and 35% (LIA) of samples with a proliferating cell nuclear antigen-like indirect immunofluorescence staining pattern were positive. In the indirect immunofluorescence proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunoblot (IB)-positive group, anti-PCNA antibodies were frequently accompanied by anti-Ro52, and in the indirect immunofluorescence PCNA-negative but LIA PCNA-positive group by various other autoantibodies. The prevalence of anti-PCNA antibodies was highest in Sjögren's syndrome (5.0%). In conclusion, the proliferating cell nuclear antigen-like staining pattern was rarely found (0.07%) in sequential, unselected sera. Further, indirect immunofluorescence is not an accurate screening method to identify anti-PCNA antibodies as their presence may be masked by other autoantibodies. The specific association of anti-PCNA antibodies with systemic lupus erythematosus was not confirmed in our study.
针对增殖细胞核抗原的自身抗体被认为是系统性红斑狼疮的特异性生物标志物,历史上通过间接免疫荧光法进行鉴定,然后通过其他更特异性的免疫测定法进行确认。我们的目的是研究各种疾病情况下的抗 PCNA 免疫反应。未选择的血清被送到临床诊断实验室,其他来自各种疾病队列和对照的血清通过酶联免疫吸附测定 (ELISA)、线免疫分析 (LIA) 和使用全长人增殖细胞核抗原的可寻址激光珠测定 (ALBIA) 进行抗 PCNA 抗体检测。在 2500 份连续的、未经选择的血清中,有 2 份(0.07%)被送到诊断实验室进行自身抗体分析,显示出增殖细胞核抗原样染色模式。ELISA、ALBIA 和 LIA 之间具有良好的一致性。在导致 100%特异性的截断值下,52.5%(ELISA)、42.5%(ALBIA)和 35%(LIA)具有增殖细胞核抗原样间接免疫荧光染色模式的样本呈阳性。在间接免疫荧光增殖细胞核抗原免疫印迹(IB)阳性组中,抗 PCNA 抗体常伴有抗 Ro52,而在间接免疫荧光 PCNA 阴性但 LIA PCNA 阳性组中则伴有各种其他自身抗体。抗 PCNA 抗体的患病率在干燥综合征中最高(5.0%)。总之,在连续的、未经选择的血清中很少发现增殖细胞核抗原样染色模式(0.07%)。此外,间接免疫荧光不是一种准确的筛选方法来识别抗 PCNA 抗体,因为它们的存在可能被其他自身抗体掩盖。在我们的研究中,抗 PCNA 抗体与系统性红斑狼疮的特异性关联未得到证实。