The Institute of Cancer Research, Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK.
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010 Sep 23;17(4):R245-62. doi: 10.1677/ERC-10-0136. Print 2010 Dec.
Breast cancer treatment has experienced several changes in the past decades due to the discovery of specific prognostic and predictive biomarkers that enable the application of more individualized therapies to different molecular subgroups. These subgroups show specific differences regarding biological clinical behavior. In addition to the classical clinical prognostic factors of breast cancer, established molecular biomarkers such as estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor have played a significant role in the selection of patients benefiting from endocrine therapy for many years. More recently, the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has been validated to be not only a prognostic factor, but also a predictor of response to HER2 targeting therapy. The shift toward an earlier diagnosis of breast cancer due to improved imaging methods and screening programs highlights the need for new factors and combinations of biomarkers to quantify the residual risk of patients and to indicate the potential value of additional treatment strategies. The marker of proliferation Ki67 has recently emerged as an important marker due to several applications in neoadjuvant therapy in addition to its moderate prognostic value. With the introduction of high-throughput technologies, numerous multigene signatures have been identified that aim to outperform traditional markers: current prospective clinical trials are seeking evidence for their definitive role in breast cancer. There exist many more factors and approaches that have the potential to become relevant in the near future including the detection of single disseminating and circulating tumor cells in blood and bone marrow as well as of circulating cell-free DNA and microRNA. Careful randomized prospective testing and comparison with existing established factors will be required to select those emerging markers that offer substantial cost-effective benefit and thereby justify their routine use for breast cancer therapy decision-making.
在过去几十年中,由于发现了特定的预后和预测生物标志物,乳腺癌的治疗发生了几次变化,这些标志物使不同的分子亚组能够应用更个体化的治疗方法。这些亚组在生物学临床行为方面表现出特定的差异。除了乳腺癌的经典临床预后因素外,确立的分子生物标志物,如雌激素受体和孕激素受体,多年来在选择受益于内分泌治疗的患者方面发挥了重要作用。最近,人类表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)已被证实不仅是一个预后因素,也是 HER2 靶向治疗反应的预测因子。由于成像方法和筛查计划的改进,乳腺癌的早期诊断有所增加,这凸显了需要新的因素和生物标志物组合来量化患者的残留风险,并表明额外治疗策略的潜在价值。由于在新辅助治疗中有多种应用,增殖标志物 Ki67 最近成为一个重要的标志物,除了其具有中度的预后价值。随着高通量技术的引入,已经确定了许多多基因标志物,旨在超越传统标志物:目前正在进行的前瞻性临床试验正在寻找其在乳腺癌中明确作用的证据。还有许多其他因素和方法有可能在不久的将来变得相关,包括检测血液和骨髓中单个播散和循环肿瘤细胞,以及检测循环无细胞 DNA 和 microRNA。需要进行仔细的随机前瞻性测试,并与现有的既定因素进行比较,以选择那些具有显著成本效益的新兴标志物,并证明其常规用于乳腺癌治疗决策是合理的。