Departments of Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug;38(8 Suppl):S335-44. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e6ab12.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) have achieved significant rates of colonization and infection in most intensive care units (ICUs). Both pathogens share common epidemiologic characteristics that suggest similar surveillance and control strategies. MRSA and VRE are readily found on colonized patients and their environment; healthcare workers' hands are a major vector of patient-to-patient transmission. Generally accepted strategies for control include conducting a baseline risk assessment and establishing metrics for monitoring MRSA and VRE rates in ICUs; promoting hand hygiene compliance; guaranteeing adequate staffing levels; ensuring adequate environmental cleaning; and using "bundled" interventions to decrease site-specific ICU infections (e.g., central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections). During periods of inadequate control, special strategies are available, although no consensus exists over which combination of these interventions is most effective. Some special interventions are pathogen specific (targeted), such as active surveillance and decolonization. Others are pathogen nonspecific (global), such as daily chlorhexidine bathing of all patients in the ICU. We review the evidence for these interventions to help ICU personnel better control MRSA and VRE in their units.
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)在大多数重症监护病房(ICU)中已达到很高的定植和感染率。这两种病原体具有共同的流行病学特征,表明可以采用相似的监测和控制策略。MRSA 和 VRE 很容易在定植患者及其环境中发现;医护人员的手是患者之间传播的主要媒介。公认的控制策略包括进行基线风险评估,并建立监测 ICU 中 MRSA 和 VRE 发生率的指标;促进手卫生依从性;确保足够的人员配置水平;确保充分的环境清洁;并采用“捆绑”干预措施来降低特定部位 ICU 感染(例如,中心静脉导管相关血流感染)。在控制不力期间,可采用特殊策略,但对于这些干预措施的哪种组合最有效,尚无共识。一些特殊干预措施是针对病原体的(针对性),例如主动监测和去定植。另一些是针对病原体的(全局性),例如对 ICU 中的所有患者进行每日氯己定沐浴。我们回顾了这些干预措施的证据,以帮助 ICU 人员更好地控制其单位中的 MRSA 和 VRE。