Huang Susan S, Yokoe Deborah S, Hinrichsen Virginia L, Spurchise Laura S, Datta Rupak, Miroshnik Irina, Platt Richard
Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 15;43(8):971-8. doi: 10.1086/507636. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
Serial interventions are often used to reduce the risk of health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. To our knowledge, the relative impact of these interventions has not previously been ascertained.
We conducted a retrospective study of 4 major infection control interventions using an interrupted time series design to evaluate their impact on MRSA bacteremia in an 800-bed hospital with 8 intensive care units (ICUs). Interventions were introduced 1 at a time during a 9-year period and involved the promotion of compliance with maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter placement, the institution of alcohol-based hand rubs for hand disinfection, the introduction of a hand hygiene campaign, and the institution of routine nares surveillance cultures for MRSA in all ICUs for patients on ICU admission and weekly thereafter while in the ICU. Positive cultures resulted in the initiation of contact isolation precautions. Using segmented regression analyses, we evaluated changes in monthly incidence and prevalence of MRSA bacteremia from their predicted values. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia was monitored as a control.
Routine surveillance cultures and subsequent contact isolation precautions resulted in substantial reductions in MRSA bacteremia in both ICUs and non-ICUs. In 16 months, the incidence density of MRSA bacteremia decreased by 75% in ICUs (P=.007) and by 40% in non-ICUs (P=.008), leading to a 67% hospital-wide reduction in the incidence density of MRSA bacteremia (P=.002). Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia rates remained stable during this time. The other interventions were not associated with a statistically significant change in MRSA bacteremia.
Routine surveillance for MRSA in ICUs allowed earlier initiation of contact isolation precautions and was associated with large and statistically significant reductions in the incidence of MRSA bacteremia in the ICUs and hospital wide. In contrast, no similar decrease was attributable to the other infection control interventions.
系列干预措施常用于降低医疗保健相关耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的风险。据我们所知,此前尚未确定这些干预措施的相对影响。
我们采用中断时间序列设计对4项主要感染控制干预措施进行了回顾性研究,以评估其对一家拥有8个重症监护病房(ICU)、800张床位的医院中MRSA菌血症的影响。在9年期间,每次引入1项干预措施,包括在中心静脉导管置入过程中促进最大无菌屏障预防措施的依从性、采用酒精擦手液进行手部消毒、开展手部卫生运动,以及在所有ICU对入院患者和此后在ICU期间每周进行MRSA鼻腔常规监测培养。培养结果呈阳性会启动接触隔离预防措施。我们使用分段回归分析评估了MRSA菌血症每月发病率和患病率与其预测值的变化。将甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症作为对照进行监测。
常规监测培养及随后的接触隔离预防措施使ICU和非ICU的MRSA菌血症大幅减少。在16个月内,ICU中MRSA菌血症的发病密度下降了75%(P = 0.007),非ICU中下降了40%(P = 0.008),导致全院MRSA菌血症发病密度下降了67%(P = 0.002)。在此期间,甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症发生率保持稳定。其他干预措施与MRSA菌血症的统计学显著变化无关。
ICU对MRSA的常规监测能够更早启动接触隔离预防措施,并且与ICU及全院范围内MRSA菌血症发病率的大幅且具有统计学意义的降低相关。相比之下,其他感染控制干预措施未导致类似的下降。