Suppr超能文献

浅表性血栓性静脉炎误诊为皮肤结节性多动脉炎:内弹性膜和致密同心肌层的特征作为诊断陷阱。

The misdiagnosis of superficial thrombophlebitis as cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa: features of the internal elastic lamina and the compact concentric muscular layer as diagnostic pitfalls.

作者信息

Chen Ko-Ron

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Dermatopathol. 2010 Oct;32(7):688-93. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0b013e3181d7759d.

Abstract

The presence of an internal elastic lamina and a compact concentric muscular layer are the cardinal histologic clues for distinguishing a small muscular artery from small muscular vein. However, the subcutaneous muscular veins in the lower legs usually have thick muscular layers with the proliferation of concentric intimal elastic fibers, which resembles the internal elastic lamina of an artery. Moreover, vertical biopsy specimens of the muscular veins can reveal a compact concentric muscular layer with a round luminal appearance, which also resembles the muscular layer in an artery. As these 2 histologic features are commonly accepted as crucial clues for identifying small to medium-sized muscular arteries, it seems that many cases that are histopathologically proven to be deep dermal or subcutaneous arteritis-including cases documented in numerous dermatology, rheumatology, and dermatopathology-related journals as cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa in Behçet's disease and relapsing polychondritis or granulomatous arteritis in nodular vasculitis-are actually consistent with the features of phlebitis or thrombophlebitis. Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa and subcutaneous thrombophlebitis are usually found in the lower legs and may present with the same cutaneous manifestation of widespread tender or painful nodular erythema. This also accounts for the difficulty in clinically and histopathologically distinguishing between these 2 disorders. Nevertheless, it is important to make a distinction between arteritis and phlebitis because misdiagnosing subcutaneous thrombophlebitis as polyarteritis nodosa may lead to overtreatment with high doses of systemic steroids. Although the veins in the lower legs may have a compact concentric smooth muscle pattern with a round lumen and the intimal elastic fiber proliferation mimicking the characteristic features of arteries, the elastic fibers in the muscular layer are distributed between the bundled smooth muscle in veins, whereas the elastic fibers are scantly distributed in the medial muscular layer in arteries. A diagnostic assessment that is based on the amount of the elastic fibers in the muscular vessel wall more reliably distinguishes a vein from an artery than does the presence or absence of the internal elastic lamina or a smooth muscle pattern.

摘要

内弹性膜和致密的同心肌层的存在是区分小肌性动脉和小肌性静脉的主要组织学线索。然而,小腿的皮下肌性静脉通常有厚的肌层,伴有同心内膜弹性纤维增生,这类似于动脉的内弹性膜。此外,肌性静脉的垂直活检标本可显示致密的同心肌层,管腔呈圆形,这也类似于动脉中的肌层。由于这两个组织学特征通常被认为是识别中小肌性动脉的关键线索,那么似乎许多经组织病理学证实为真皮深层或皮下动脉炎的病例——包括众多皮肤病学、风湿病学以及与皮肤病理学相关期刊中记载的病例,如白塞病中的皮肤结节性多动脉炎、复发性多软骨炎或结节性血管炎中的肉芽肿性动脉炎——实际上与静脉炎或血栓性静脉炎的特征相符。皮肤结节性多动脉炎和皮下血栓性静脉炎通常见于小腿,可能表现为相同的皮肤表现,即广泛的压痛性或疼痛性结节性红斑。这也解释了在临床和组织病理学上区分这两种疾病的困难。然而,区分动脉炎和静脉炎很重要,因为将皮下血栓性静脉炎误诊为结节性多动脉炎可能导致大剂量全身用类固醇的过度治疗。尽管小腿的静脉可能有致密的同心平滑肌模式,管腔呈圆形,内膜弹性纤维增生模仿动脉的特征,但肌层中的弹性纤维分布于静脉中束状平滑肌之间,而弹性纤维在动脉的中膜肌层中分布稀少。基于肌性血管壁中弹性纤维数量的诊断评估比内弹性膜的有无或平滑肌模式更可靠地区分静脉和动脉。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验