Suppr超能文献

胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术:复发模式及预后因素分析。

Thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of patterns and prognostic factors for recurrence.

机构信息

Upper Gastrointestinal and Soft Tissue Unit, The University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):281-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e909a2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors report the recurrence pattern of esophageal cancer after thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy (TAE), comparing it to the recurrence pattern after open surgery and identify prognostic factors for recurrence.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

To improve long-term survival for esophageal cancer radical surgery has been proposed increasingly, however, recurrent disease remains a problem. Opinion is divided as to the adequacy of resection possible using minimally invasive techniques with concerns that there may be an increased incidence in locoregional recurrence.

METHODS

A total of 221 patients who underwent esophagectomy at the Princess Alexandra Hospital without any neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were identified from a prospective database. Patients were followed up for the detection of symptomatic recurrence for a median of 59 months.

RESULTS

Within this group 165 patients underwent TAE and 56 an open transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE). The 5-year overall recurrence rate was 133/221 (60%). The 5-year rates of symptomatic first recurrence following TAE was 4%, 9%, and 47% for local, regional, and distant recurrence, respectively. The 5-year rates of symptomatic first recurrence following TTE was 5%, 18%, and 55% for local, regional, and distant recurrence, respectively. Operative approach was not a prognostic factor for any type of recurrence. Independent prognostic factors associated with locoregional recurrence were positive margins and number of positive nodes. Distant recurrence was associated with T stage, differentiation, tumor length >6 cm, and number of positive nodes.

CONCLUSION

Distant recurrence remains a significant problem in esophageal cancer. TAE achieved adequate locoregional control and compared favorably with open TTE.

摘要

目的

本研究报告了胸腔镜辅助食管切除术(TAE)后食管癌的复发模式,并将其与开放手术后的复发模式进行比较,同时确定复发的预后因素。

摘要背景数据

为了提高食管癌根治性手术的长期生存率,人们越来越多地提出采用微创技术,但复发病仍然是一个问题。人们对使用微创技术进行根治性切除的充分性存在分歧,有人担心局部区域复发的发生率可能会增加。

方法

从前瞻性数据库中确定了 221 名在Princess Alexandra 医院接受食管癌切除术且未接受任何新辅助或辅助治疗的患者。中位随访时间为 59 个月,以检测有症状的复发。

结果

在这一组患者中,165 例患者接受了 TAE,56 例患者接受了开放性经胸食管切除术(TTE)。221 例患者的 5 年总体复发率为 133/221(60%)。TAE 后局部、区域和远处复发的 5 年有症状首次复发率分别为 4%、9%和 47%。TTE 后局部、区域和远处复发的 5 年有症状首次复发率分别为 5%、18%和 55%。手术方式不是任何类型复发的预后因素。与局部区域复发相关的独立预后因素是阳性切缘和阳性淋巴结数量。远处复发与 T 分期、分化程度、肿瘤长度>6cm 和阳性淋巴结数量有关。

结论

远处复发仍然是食管癌的一个重要问题。TAE 实现了足够的局部区域控制,与开放性 TTE 相比效果良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验