Suppr超能文献

颈椎硬膜外注射治疗无椎间盘突出或神经根炎的慢性椎间盘源性颈痛:一项随机、双盲、对照试验的初步结果。

Cervical epidural injections in chronic discogenic neck pain without disc herniation or radiculitis: preliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

机构信息

Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, USA.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2010 Jul-Aug;13(4):E265-78.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic neck pain is a common problem in the adult population with a typical 12-month prevalence of 30% to 50%. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the causes and treatments of chronic neck pain. Despite limited evidence, cervical epidural injections are one of the commonly performed non-surgical interventions in the management of chronic neck pain.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, active control trial.

SETTING

An interventional pain management practice, a specialty referral center, a private practice setting in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical interlaminar epidural injections with local anesthetic with or without steroids in the management of chronic neck pain with or without upper extremity pain in patients without disc herniation or radiculitis or facet joint pain.

METHODS

Patients without disc herniation or radiculitis and negative for facet joint pain by means of controlled diagnostic medial branch blocks were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: injection of local anesthetic only or local anesthetic mixed with non-particulate betamethasone. Seventy patients were included in this analysis. Randomization was performed by computer-generated random allocation sequence by simple randomization.

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT

Multiple outcome measures were utilized including the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), employment status, and opioid intake with assessment at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. Significant pain relief or functional status was defined as a 50% or more reduction.

RESULTS

Significant pain relief (> or = 50%) was demonstrated in 80% of patients in both groups and functional status improvement (> or = 50%) in 69% of Group I and 80% of Group II. The overall average procedures per year were 3.9 +/- 1.01 in Group I and 3.9 +/- 0.8 in Group II with an average total relief per year of 40.3 +/- 14.1 weeks in Group I and 42.1 +/- 9.9 weeks in Group II over a period of 52 weeks in the successful group.

LIMITATIONS

The results of this study are limited by the lack of a placebo group and a preliminary report of 70 patients, with 35 patients in each group.

CONCLUSION

Cervical interlaminar epidural injections with local anesthetic with or without steroids may be effective in patients with chronic function-limiting discogenic.

摘要

背景

慢性颈痛是成年人群中的常见问题,典型的 12 个月患病率为 30%至 50%。然而,对于慢性颈痛的病因和治疗方法,尚未达成共识。尽管证据有限,但颈椎硬膜外注射是管理慢性颈痛的常用非手术干预措施之一。

研究设计

一项随机、双盲、活性对照试验。

设置

在美国的介入性疼痛管理实践、专业转诊中心、私人执业环境中进行。

目的

评估在无椎间盘突出、神经根炎或小关节痛的情况下,局部麻醉剂联合或不联合皮质类固醇的颈椎关节突间硬膜外注射治疗慢性颈痛伴或不伴上肢痛患者的有效性。

方法

通过控制诊断性内侧支阻滞排除椎间盘突出或神经根炎且小关节痛阴性的患者,随机分为两组:仅注射局部麻醉剂或局部麻醉剂混合非颗粒倍他米松。本分析纳入 70 例患者。随机化通过计算机生成的随机分配序列通过简单随机化进行。

结果评估

采用数字评分量表(NRS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、就业状况和阿片类药物摄入等多项指标进行评估,治疗后 3、6 和 12 个月进行评估。显著疼痛缓解或功能状态定义为 50%或以上的缓解。

结果

两组患者均有 80%的患者出现显著疼痛缓解(≥50%),69%的组 I 和 80%的组 II 患者的功能状态改善(≥50%)。组 I 每年平均手术次数为 3.9 ± 1.01 次,组 II 为 3.9 ± 0.8 次,组 I 每年平均总缓解时间为 40.3 ± 14.1 周,组 II 为 42.1 ± 9.9 周,两组均在成功组随访 52 周。

局限性

本研究结果受到缺乏安慰剂组和初步报告的 70 例患者(每组 35 例)的限制。

结论

局部麻醉剂联合或不联合皮质类固醇的颈椎关节突间硬膜外注射可能对慢性功能受限的椎间盘源性疼痛患者有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验