College of Acupuncture and Orthopedics, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China.
The Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430070, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2022 May 26;2022:8952220. doi: 10.1155/2022/8952220. eCollection 2022.
To compare the effectiveness of cervical epidural injections of local anesthetic with vs. without a steroid.
Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library) were used to search and assess all clinical randomized controlled trials regarding the clinical efficacy of epidural injections from January 01, 2009, to October 31, 2020. Cochrane review criteria and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment instrument were used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included studies. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed according to best evidence synthesis principles and by single-arm meta-analysis, respectively.
Based on the search criteria, 4 RCTs were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in the single-arm meta-analysis. Treatment with lidocaine alone or with the steroid resulted in decreases of 4.46 and 4.29 points, respectively, in pain scores and of 15.8 and 14.46 points, respectively, in functional scores at 6 months. Similar trends were observed at the 1-year follow-up: pain scores decreased by 4.27 and 4.14 points, while functional scores decreased by 15.94 and 14.44 points in patients with neck pain who received lidocaine without or with the steroid, respectively. In the 3 studies that reported 2-year follow-up data, patients with neck pain treated with lidocaine or lidocaine + steroid showed 4.2- and 4.14-point decreases, in pain score and 15.92- and 14.89-point decreases, respectively, in functional scores.
The studies showed level I (strong) evidence for short- and long-term improvements in pain relief and functionality with cervical epidural injections of local anesthetic alone or with a steroid in the management of neck pain.
比较局部麻醉药与皮质类固醇联合用于颈椎硬膜外注射的疗效。
使用三个数据库(PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆),从 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日,检索并评估所有关于硬膜外注射治疗颈痛的临床随机对照试验。采用 Cochrane 评价标准和介入性疼痛管理技术-可靠性和偏倚风险评估工具对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评价。根据最佳证据综合原则进行定性和定量分析,分别采用单臂meta 分析。
根据检索标准,对 4 项 RCT 进行了单臂 meta 分析的定性和定量分析。单独使用利多卡因或联合使用皮质类固醇治疗,6 个月时疼痛评分分别降低 4.46 分和 4.29 分,功能评分分别降低 15.8 分和 14.46 分。在 1 年随访时也观察到类似的趋势:疼痛评分分别降低 4.27 分和 4.14 分,功能评分分别降低 15.94 分和 14.44 分,颈痛患者接受利多卡因无或联合皮质类固醇治疗。在 3 项报告 2 年随访数据的研究中,颈痛患者接受利多卡因或利多卡因+皮质类固醇治疗后,疼痛评分分别降低 4.2-和 4.14 分,功能评分分别降低 15.92-和 14.89 分。
这些研究为单独使用局部麻醉药或皮质类固醇联合用于颈椎硬膜外注射治疗颈痛在缓解疼痛和改善功能方面的短期和长期疗效提供了 I 级(强)证据。