Giri Birendra Raj
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
South Asia Res. 2010;30(2):145-64. doi: 10.1177/026272801003000203.
This article highlights that in Nepal, the promise of education seems to have become a magnet of child bondedness. After some government intervention in 2000, the haliya and kamaiya bonded labour practices have become a socially stigmatising matter for adults, and a legal hurdle for kisan (landlord) employers, but the practices continue. Both parties to these bonded labour practices seem to have found the idea of education as a safe meeting point. While parents send their children to work with the hope of obtaining education for them, besides other material benefits, employers seek to pay as little as possible and will often not give sufficient time to their young workers to study. Though most children have little or no say during the contract, they, too, are initially attracted by the promise of education. Based on detailed fieldwork, this article explores to what extent the largely unfulfilled educational aspirations for Musahar and Tharu working children can be seen as a restrained form of empowerment or a continuing system of bonded labour in Nepal.
本文强调,在尼泊尔,教育的承诺似乎已成为儿童债役制的诱因。2000年政府进行了一些干预后,哈利亚和卡迈亚债役劳动做法对成年人来说已成为一种社会耻辱,对基桑(地主)雇主来说则构成法律障碍,但这些做法仍在继续。这些债役劳动做法的双方似乎都把教育理念当作一个安全的交汇点。父母送孩子去工作,希望除了获得其他物质利益外,还能让孩子接受教育,而雇主则尽量少付报酬,而且往往不给年轻工人足够的学习时间。虽然大多数孩子在签订合同时几乎没有或根本没有发言权,但他们最初也被教育的承诺所吸引。基于详细的实地调查,本文探讨了穆萨哈尔和塔鲁族童工基本未实现的教育愿望在多大程度上可被视为一种受限的赋权形式,或是尼泊尔持续存在的债役劳动制度。