Neurointensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Pasteur, Catamarca, Argentina.
Neurocrit Care. 2010 Dec;13(3):425-38. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9404-8.
There is growing debate over the value of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) in critically ill patients. Available trials have been performed in general medical or surgical intensive care units, and the results may not be directly applicable to patients with severe acute brain disease because these patients may have heightened susceptibility to hyperglycemia (HyperG) and hypoglycemia. Our objective was to review the pathophysiology and effects of HyperG and hypoglycemia in neurocritical patients and to analyze the potential role of IIT in this population. Source data were obtained from a PubMed search of the medical literature combining the terms HyperG, hypoglycemia, insulin, stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), traumatic brain injury (TBI), spinal cord injury (SCI), and related diagnoses. Brain metabolism is highly dependent on constant supply of glucose. As a consequence, the acutely injured brain is particularly sensitive to hypoglycemia, which can induce a state of energy failure (metabolic crisis). Meanwhile, neurocritical patients have a high prevalence of HyperG, and its occurrence is associated with poor outcome after acute ischemic stroke, ICH, SAH, and TBI. It is unclear whether this association is due to direct detrimental effects exerted by HyperG or simply represents a marker of severe brain injury. Insulin has been shown to have various potentially pleiotropic neuroprotective properties in experimental models. However, the safety and efficacy of IIT in patients with critical brain disease have not been well studied. Available results do not support the use of IIT to maintain strict normoglycemia in this population. Patients with critical brain disease should have frequent glucose monitoring because severe HyperG and even modest hypoglycemia may be detrimental. Careful use of insulin infusion protocols appears advisable, but maintenance of strict normoglycemia cannot be recommended. Rigorous studies must be conducted to assess the value of insulin therapy and to determine the optimal blood glucose targets in patients with the most common acute vascular and traumatic brain insults.
关于危重病患者强化胰岛素治疗(IIT)的价值存在越来越多的争议。现有的试验是在普通内科或外科重症监护病房进行的,其结果可能不能直接应用于患有严重急性脑部疾病的患者,因为这些患者可能对高血糖(HyperG)和低血糖更敏感。我们的目的是回顾神经危重病患者中 HyperG 和低血糖的病理生理学和影响,并分析 IIT 在这一人群中的潜在作用。源数据来自于对PubMed 医学文献的搜索,结合了 HyperG、低血糖、胰岛素、中风、脑出血(ICH)、蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)、创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、脊髓损伤(SCI)和相关诊断的术语。大脑代谢高度依赖于葡萄糖的持续供应。因此,急性损伤的大脑对低血糖特别敏感,低血糖会导致能量衰竭(代谢危机)。同时,神经危重病患者 HyperG 的发生率很高,其发生与急性缺血性中风、ICH、SAH 和 TBI 后的不良预后相关。目前尚不清楚这种相关性是由于 HyperG 直接产生的有害作用,还是仅仅代表严重脑损伤的一个标志物。在实验模型中,胰岛素已被证明具有多种潜在的多效性神经保护特性。然而,在患有严重脑部疾病的患者中,IIT 的安全性和有效性尚未得到很好的研究。现有的结果并不支持在该人群中使用 IIT 来维持严格的正常血糖水平。患有严重脑部疾病的患者应进行频繁的血糖监测,因为严重的 HyperG 甚至轻微的低血糖都可能有害。谨慎使用胰岛素输注方案似乎是明智的,但不能推荐维持严格的正常血糖水平。必须进行严格的研究来评估胰岛素治疗的价值,并确定最常见的急性血管和创伤性脑损伤患者的最佳血糖目标。