Oxfordshire Primary Care Trust, Oxford, UK.
Med Teach. 2010;32(7):e248-62. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.489126.
E-mentoring had the potential to improve medical training, patient services, could be cost-effective, and support continued professional development. Research in terms of required core-competences for its effective utilisation in medical education seemed to be inconsistent, fragmented with significant variations in methodological rigor.
The primary aim was to review and synthesise existing evidence in educational science that addressed the question: "what are the required core-competences in e-mentoring for medical educators?"
A systematic literature search covered 25 literature databases and employed 42 single search terms and concepts and their Boolean combinations. Coverage was improved by Internet searches, further focus on "Grey literature" and the manual searching of library journals and inspecting the bibliographies of the references obtained by these methods.
A total of 4344 citations from the literature search were identified. Altogether 44 items were finally selected for inclusion in the study. The extant quality of published research was generally weak. The weight of the best available evidence suggested that seven specific e-mentoring core-competence domains were seen as significant.
E-mentoring seemed educationally effective and complemented face-to-face mentoring for continuous professional development. Research in this field needs improvement in terms of rigor and quality.
电子导师制有可能改善医学培训、患者服务,具有成本效益,并支持持续的专业发展。然而,关于其在医学教育中有效利用所需的核心能力的研究似乎不一致、零散,方法严谨性存在显著差异。
主要目的是回顾和综合现有的教育科学证据,以回答以下问题:“医学教育者进行电子导师制需要哪些核心能力?”
系统文献检索涵盖了 25 个文献数据库,并使用了 42 个单一的搜索词和概念及其布尔组合。通过互联网搜索、进一步关注“灰色文献”以及手动搜索图书馆期刊和检查通过这些方法获得的参考文献的书目,来提高文献检索的覆盖范围。
从文献检索中总共确定了 4344 条引文。最终共有 44 项被选入研究。已发表研究的质量普遍较差。现有最佳证据的权重表明,有七个特定的电子导师制核心能力领域被认为是重要的。
电子导师制在教育上是有效的,并且可以补充面对面的导师制,以促进持续的专业发展。该领域的研究需要在严谨性和质量方面得到改进。