• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种收集相关临床信息并据此采取行动的新方法:SCAMPs。

A novel approach to gathering and acting on relevant clinical information: SCAMPs.

作者信息

Rathod Rahul H, Farias Michael, Friedman Kevin G, Graham Dionne, Fulton David R, Newburger Jane W, Colan Steven, Jenkins Kathy, Lock James E

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):343-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00438.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00438.x
PMID:20653701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3376528/
Abstract

The current tools to adequately inform the process of improving health-care delivery consist primarily of retrospective studies, prospective trials, and clinical practice guidelines. We propose a novel and systematic approach that bridges the gap of our current tools to affect change, provides an infrastructure to improve health-care delivery, and identifies unnecessary resource utilization. The objective of this special article is to introduce the rationale and methods for this endeavor entitled "Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plans" (SCAMPs). SCAMPs take a relatively heterogeneous patient population and through a process of iterative analysis and modification of standardized assessment and management algorithms, SCAMPs allow the intrinsic biologic variability in a patient population to emerge and be understood. SCAMPs can be used to complement our currently available tools in order to result in incremental and sustained improvement in health-care delivery.

摘要

目前用于充分指导改善医疗服务过程的工具主要包括回顾性研究、前瞻性试验和临床实践指南。我们提出了一种新颖且系统的方法,该方法弥合了当前工具在影响变革方面的差距,提供了改善医疗服务的基础设施,并识别出不必要的资源利用情况。这篇专题文章的目的是介绍这项名为“标准化临床评估与管理计划”(SCAMPs)的工作的基本原理和方法。SCAMPs针对相对异质的患者群体,通过对标准化评估和管理算法进行迭代分析和修改的过程,使患者群体内在的生物学变异性得以显现并被理解。SCAMPs可用于补充我们现有的工具,从而实现医疗服务的逐步和持续改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/6e9dc07f46b8/nihms381128f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/5301395cdc44/nihms381128f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/844092529502/nihms381128f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/ed83e2096b7a/nihms381128f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/dcaf658f809d/nihms381128f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/8bade6d2276c/nihms381128f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/6e9dc07f46b8/nihms381128f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/5301395cdc44/nihms381128f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/844092529502/nihms381128f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/ed83e2096b7a/nihms381128f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/dcaf658f809d/nihms381128f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/8bade6d2276c/nihms381128f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/3376528/6e9dc07f46b8/nihms381128f6.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel approach to gathering and acting on relevant clinical information: SCAMPs.一种收集相关临床信息并据此采取行动的新方法:SCAMPs。
Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):343-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00438.x.
2
Provider attitudes toward Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plans (SCAMPs).医疗服务提供者对标准化临床评估与管理计划(SCAMPs)的态度。
Congenit Heart Dis. 2011 Nov-Dec;6(6):558-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00579.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
3
Outcomes research-standardized clinical assessment and management plans.结果研究——标准化临床评估与管理计划
Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):337. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00437.x.
4
Is rationing the only way out?定量配给是唯一的出路吗?
Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):338. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00432.x.
5
Maternal/fetal care.母婴护理。
Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;5(6):531. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00463.x.
6
Deciding without data.无数据决策。
Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):339-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00433.x.
7
SCAMPs: A new tool for an old problem.SNARE 相关膜蛋白:解决老问题的新工具。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Sep;10(9):633-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2419. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
Gathering and learning from relevant clinical data: a new framework.收集相关临床数据并从中学习:一个新框架。
Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):143-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000508.
9
Quality is everything.质量就是一切。
Congenit Heart Dis. 2011 Mar-Apr;6(2):87. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00511.x.
10
Feasibility of a Team Approach to Complex Congenital Heart Defect Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up: Early Experience of a Combined Cardiology/Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Follow-Up Program.团队协作进行复杂先天性心脏病神经发育随访的可行性:心脏科/新生儿重症监护病房联合随访项目的早期经验
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Jul;9(4):432-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002614. Epub 2016 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Department Admissions of Children with Chest Pain before and during COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情之前及期间因胸痛前往急诊科就诊的儿童情况
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 30;10(2):246. doi: 10.3390/children10020246.
2
Multi-Institutional Practice-Patterns in Fetal Congenital Heart Disease Following Implementation of a Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan.多机构实践模式:在实施标准化临床评估和管理计划后,胎儿先天性心脏病。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e021598. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021598. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
Applying Lessons from an Inaugural Clinical Pathway to Establish a Clinical Effectiveness Program.

本文引用的文献

1
Resource utilization after introduction of a standardized clinical assessment and management plan.引入标准化临床评估与管理计划后的资源利用情况
Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):374-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00434.x.
2
Needles in hay: chest pain as the presenting symptom in children with serious underlying cardiac pathology.大海捞针:严重潜在心脏病变患儿以胸痛为首发症状
Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):366-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00436.x.
3
To close or not to close: the very small patent ductus arteriosus.
应用首个临床路径的经验教训来建立临床有效性计划。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2018 Oct 31;3(6):e115. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000115. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
4
Use of a standardized asthma severity score to determine emergency department disposition for paediatric asthma: A cohort study.使用标准化哮喘严重程度评分来确定儿科哮喘患者的急诊科处置:一项队列研究。
Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Jul;24(4):227-233. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxy125. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
Challenges in Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia in Developing Countries.发展中国家小儿心脏麻醉面临的挑战
Front Pediatr. 2018 Oct 29;6:254. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00254. eCollection 2018.
6
Improving Long-Term Outcomes After Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: From Observational Follow-Up Programs Toward Risk Stratification.改善体外膜肺氧合后的长期预后:从观察性随访计划到风险分层
Front Pediatr. 2018 Jun 26;6:177. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00177. eCollection 2018.
7
Pediatric Chest Pain-Low-Probability Referral: A Multi-Institutional Analysis From Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plans (SCAMPs®), the Pediatric Health Information Systems Database, and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.小儿胸痛——低概率转诊:来自标准化临床评估与管理计划(SCAMPs®)、儿科健康信息系统数据库及国家门诊医疗调查的多机构分析
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Nov;56(13):1201-1208. doi: 10.1177/0009922816684605. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
8
A Randomized Trial of Displaying Paid Price Information on Imaging Study and Procedure Ordering Rates.一项关于在影像学检查和诊疗订单率上显示付费价格信息的随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):434-448. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3917-6. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
9
Design and Methodological Considerations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Urologic and Renal Protocol for the Newborn and Young Child with Spina Bifida.疾病预防控制中心关于脊髓脊膜膨出新生儿和幼儿泌尿科及肾脏协议的设计和方法学考虑。
J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1728-1734. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.081. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
Visual assessment of the similarity between a patient and trial population: Is This Clinical Trial Applicable to My Patient?对患者与试验人群之间相似性的视觉评估:该临床试验是否适用于我的患者?
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Jun 8;7(2):477-88. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-12-RA-0178. eCollection 2016.
是否闭合:极小的动脉导管未闭
Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):354-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00435.x.
4
Predictors of technical success and postnatal biventricular outcome after in utero aortic valvuloplasty for aortic stenosis with evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome.对于合并进行性左心发育不全综合征的主动脉狭窄,宫内主动脉瓣成形术后技术成功及出生后双心室转归的预测因素。
Circulation. 2009 Oct 13;120(15):1482-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.848994. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
5
Health spending projections through 2018: recession effects add uncertainty to the outlook.2018 年之前的医疗支出预测:经济衰退的影响给前景带来了不确定性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):w346-57. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w346. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
6
The perfect storm of overutilization.过度使用的完美风暴。
JAMA. 2008 Jun 18;299(23):2789-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.23.2789.
7
Guidance for guidelines.指南的指南。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):331-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068282.
8
Cash interests taint drug advice.金钱利益玷污药物建议。
Nature. 2005 Oct 20;437(7062):1070-1. doi: 10.1038/4371070a.
9
Is the methodological quality of guidelines declining in the US? Comparison of the quality of US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) guidelines with those published subsequently.美国指南的方法学质量在下降吗?美国医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)指南与随后发布的指南的质量比较。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12(6):428-34. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.428.
10
Improving the quality of care--can we practice what we preach?提高医疗质量——我们能言行一致吗?
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2681-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe030085.