Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medial Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Jul 24.
Glenoid erosion and medial migration of the humeral head prosthesis have been observed after most types of shoulder arthroplasty. A method of measuring the change in humeral head position with time after shoulder prosthetic arthroplasty was applied it to 14 shoulders that underwent humeral hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming. We hypothesized that the measurement technique would be reproducible and that the rate of wear would be small in the series of shoulders studied.
Standardized anteroposterior and axillary radiographs were obtained after surgery. Two examiners measured the position of the humeral head center in relation to scapular reference coordinates for the anteroposterior and axillary projections and plotted these values against time after surgery. The change in position was characterized as the slope of this plot. Shoulders were included if there were at least 3 sets of postoperative films, the last being at least 2 years after surgery.
The slopes measured by the 2 examiners agreed within 0.5 mm/y for the anteroposterior and the axillary projections. For the series of shoulder arthroplasties, the rate of movement of the head center toward the scapula was less than 0.4 mm/y for either examiner in either projection.
Medial migration is a concern after any type of shoulder arthroplasty, whether a hemiarthroplasty, a biological interpositional arthroplasty, or a total shoulder arthroplasty. Quantifying the rate of medial migration over time after shoulder arthroplasty is an important element of clinical follow-up.
This is an inexpensive, practical, and reproducible method that can be used to determine the rate of medial migration of the humeral head on plain radiographs after shoulder arthroplasty. The average rate of medial migration in the shoulders in this study was small.
在大多数类型的肩关节置换术后,都观察到肩峰下骨侵蚀和肱骨头假体向内侧迁移。应用一种测量肩关节假体置换术后肱骨头位置随时间变化的方法,对 14 例接受同心性盂肱关节扩孔肱骨头半关节成形术的肩关节进行了研究。我们假设该测量技术具有可重复性,并且在研究的肩关节系列中,磨损率很小。
术后获得标准前后位和腋位 X 线片。两名检查者测量肱骨头中心相对于肩胛参考坐标的位置,用于前后位和腋位投影,并将这些值与术后时间相对照。位置变化的特征是该图的斜率。如果至少有 3 组术后 X 线片,且最后一组至少在手术后 2 年,则纳入肩关节。
两名检查者在前后位和腋位测量的斜率相差 0.5 毫米/年以内。对于该系列肩关节置换术,头中心向肩胛的移动速度在任何投影中,任何一位检查者都小于 0.4 毫米/年。
任何类型的肩关节置换术后,无论是半关节成形术、生物间置关节成形术还是全肩关节置换术,都存在内侧迁移的问题。定量评估肩关节置换术后内侧迁移的速度是临床随访的重要内容。
这是一种经济、实用且可重复的方法,可用于确定肩关节置换术后 X 线平片上肱骨头内侧迁移的速度。本研究中肩关节的平均内侧迁移率较小。