Brain Infections Group, Division of Neurological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
QJM. 2010 Oct;103(10):749-58. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq121. Epub 2010 Jul 24.
Over the last 15 years, bacterial meningitis has received considerable attention, including national guidelines, whilst viral central nervous system (CNS) infections have been relatively neglected. A recent pilot study suggested that management of patients with suspected viral encephalitis was often suboptimal.
To examine the relative incidence, clinical features and management of suspected acute CNS infections in adults across the NHS North West Region.
A multicentre cross-sectional retrospective cohort study at 10 hospitals across the region over 3 months (from September to December 2007). Following a screen of all patients who had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis or received intravenous aciclovir and/or third-generation cephalosporin, those with clinical features suspicious of a CNS infection were included. Management was compared with the national meningitis and regional encephalitis guidelines.
Three hundred and eighty-five patients were screened; 217 patients had a suspected CNS infection and 44 (20%) had a CNS infection: 18 aseptic meningitis (one herpes simplex virus [HSV]-2), 13 purulent meningitis (four Streptococcus pneumoniae) and 13 encephalitis (three HSV-1). The median (range) time from admission to suspicion of CNS infection and to LP was longer for patients with encephalitis than meningitis [4 (0.3-312) vs. 0.3 (0.1-12) h, P<0.001, and 23 (4-360) vs. 12 (2-48) h, P=0.042, respectively]; and the median time to treatment was longer for aciclovir than cephalosporin [7 (0.5-312) vs. 3 (0.3-312) h, P=0.002].
Encephalitis was as common as purulent meningitis, and HSV as common as Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, the management of patients with encephalitis was worse than meningitis. National encephalitis guidelines are needed.
在过去的 15 年中,细菌性脑膜炎受到了相当多的关注,包括国家指南,而病毒性中枢神经系统(CNS)感染则相对被忽视。最近的一项试点研究表明,疑似病毒性脑炎患者的治疗往往并不理想。
检查英国国民保健署西北地区成人疑似急性中枢神经系统感染的相对发病率、临床特征和治疗方法。
在该地区的 10 家医院进行了为期 3 个月(2007 年 9 月至 12 月)的多中心横断面回顾性队列研究。对所有进行过脑脊液(CSF)分析或接受过阿昔洛韦静脉注射和/或第三代头孢菌素治疗的患者进行筛选后,将具有疑似中枢神经系统感染临床特征的患者纳入研究。将治疗方法与国家脑膜炎和区域脑炎指南进行了比较。
共筛选了 385 名患者;217 名患者有疑似中枢神经系统感染,44 名(20%)患者有中枢神经系统感染:18 例无菌性脑膜炎(1 例单纯疱疹病毒[HSV]-2),13 例化脓性脑膜炎(4 例肺炎链球菌)和 13 例脑炎(3 例 HSV-1)。与脑膜炎患者相比,脑炎患者从入院到怀疑中枢神经系统感染和腰椎穿刺的中位(范围)时间更长[4(0.3-312)与 0.3(0.1-12)小时,P<0.001,和 23(4-360)与 12(2-48)小时,P=0.042];阿昔洛韦治疗的中位时间长于头孢菌素[7(0.5-312)与 3(0.3-312)小时,P=0.002]。
脑炎与化脓性脑膜炎一样常见,单纯疱疹病毒与肺炎链球菌一样常见。然而,脑炎患者的治疗效果不如脑膜炎患者。需要制定国家脑炎指南。