流行病学研究的预注册：理念的不当混合。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Preregistration of epidemiologic studies: an ill-founded mix of ideas.

作者信息

Vandenbroucke Jan P

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2010 Sep;21(5):619-20. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e942b8.

DOI:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e942b8

PMID:20657296

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Preregistration of epidemiologic studies: an ill-founded mix of ideas.流行病学研究的预注册：理念的不当混合。

Epidemiology. 2010 Sep;21(5):619-20. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e942b8.

Preregistration of epidemiology protocols: a commentary in support.流行病学研究方案的预注册：一篇支持性评论

Epidemiology. 2011 Mar;22(2):135-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318207fc7c.

Should preregistration of epidemiologic study protocols become compulsory? Reflections and a counterproposal.流行病学研究方案的预注册应成为强制要求吗？思考与一项反建议。

Epidemiology. 2012 Mar;23(2):184-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318245c05b.

Preregistration of study protocols is unlikely to improve the yield from our science, but other strategies might.研究方案的预先注册不太可能提高我们科研的产出，但其他策略或许可以。

Epidemiology. 2010 Sep;21(5):612-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e9bba6.

[Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].[流行病学研究的解读。研究类型、偏倚因素、因果关系]

Rev Prat. 1999 Oct 15;49(16):1797-804.

[What is epidemiology and what is cancer epidemiology?].[什么是流行病学以及什么是癌症流行病学？]

Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 May 27;164(22):2871-6.

Preregistration of epidemiology protocols.流行病学研究方案的预注册

Epidemiology. 2011 Jul;22(4):607; author reply 607-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821c08d9.

Strengthening the reporting of observational epidemiology (STROBE) in sexual health.加强性健康领域观察性流行病学研究报告规范（STROBE）

Sex Transm Infect. 2009 Jun;85(3):162-4. doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.028985.

A vision of accessible epidemiology.

Epidemiology. 2010 Sep;21(5):616-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e9be3f.

[Commentary V. How can a highly qualified science be guaranteed for challenges of Public Health?].

Soz Praventivmed. 2005;50(1):36-7.

引用本文的文献

Causal relationship between hypertension and ischemic stroke: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.高血压与缺血性中风之间的因果关系：一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究。

Brain Circ. 2024 Sep 26;10(3):257-264. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_105_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.

Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions.防范二次数据分析中的研究人员偏差：挑战与潜在解决方案。

Eur J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;37(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00839-0. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies.观察性研究的 DEBATE 统计分析计划。

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0879-5.

Strengthening standards, transparency, and collaboration to support medicine evaluation: Ten years of the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP).加强标准、透明度与协作以支持药物评估：欧洲药物流行病学和药物警戒中心网络（ENCePP）的十年

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):245-252. doi: 10.1002/pds.4381. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

Perspective: An Extension of the STROBE Statement for Observational Studies in Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): Explanation and Elaboration.观点：营养流行病学观察性研究 STROBE 声明的扩展（STROBE-nut）：解释和说明。

Adv Nutr. 2017 Sep 15;8(5):652-678. doi: 10.3945/an.117.015941. Print 2017 Sep.

Improving Concordance in Environmental Epidemiology: A Three-Part Proposal.提高环境流行病学的一致性：一个由三部分组成的提议。

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2015;18(2):105-20. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2015.1051612.

Improving the transparency of prognosis research: the role of reporting, data sharing, registration, and protocols.提高预后研究的透明度：报告、数据共享、注册及方案的作用。

PLoS Med. 2014 Jul 8;11(7):e1001671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001671. eCollection 2014 Jul.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验