Higgins W
Department of Health and Safety, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green 42101.
Fam Med. 1991 May-Jun;23(4):292-6.
Recent proposals to reform the health care financing system have sparked discussions concerning the need to ration health care. Relative to other western industrialized democracies, the US rations primary and preventive care more, tertiary care less, and makes greater use of price rationing and bureaucratic controls. Because insurance coverage is not universal and the extent of coverage varies across services, the poor and those patients needing long-term care are most heavily affected by price rationing. The current system also works to the advantage of procedure-oriented specialists and to the disadvantage of primary care physicians. Major reform of health care financing could change what is rationed, how it is rationed, and who is most affected. However, some rationing will remain necessary under any conceivable financing system.
近期关于改革医疗保健融资体系的提议引发了有关医疗保健配给必要性的讨论。与其他西方工业化民主国家相比,美国在初级和预防性医疗保健方面的配给更多,在三级医疗保健方面的配给更少,并且更多地使用价格配给和官僚控制手段。由于保险覆盖并不普遍,且覆盖范围因服务而异,穷人和那些需要长期护理的患者受价格配给的影响最大。当前的体系也对以手术为导向的专科医生有利,而对初级保健医生不利。医疗保健融资的重大改革可能会改变配给的内容、配给方式以及受影响最大的人群。然而,在任何可想象的融资体系下,某种程度的配给仍将是必要的。