Research Institute of the Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;31(9):908-17. doi: 10.1086/655839.
Standard precautions are advocated for reducing the number of injuries caused by needles and sharp medical devices ("sharps injuries"), but the effectiveness of gloves in preventing such injuries has not been established. We evaluated factors associated with gloving practices and identified associations between gloving practices and sharps-injury risk.
Usual-frequency case-crossover study.
Thirteen medical centers in the United States and Canada.
Six hundred thirty-six healthcare workers who presented to employee health clinics after sharps injury.
Structured telephone questionnaires were administered to assess usual behaviors and circumstances at the time of injury.
Of 636 injured healthcare workers, 195 were scrubbed in an operating room or procedure suite when injured, and 441 were injured elsewhere. Nonscrubbed individuals were more commonly gloved when treating patients who were perceived to have a high risk of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus infection than when treating other patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.53 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.30-4.91]). Nurses (aOR, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.04-0.32]) and other employees (aOR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.07-0.77]) were less commonly gloved at injury than were physicians and physician trainees. Gloves reduced injury risk in case-crossover analyses (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.22-0.50]). In scrubbed individuals, involvement in an orthopedic procedure was associated with double gloving at injury (aOR, 13.7 [95% CI, 4.55-41.3]); this gloving practice was associated with decreased injury risk (IRR, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.10-0.42]).
Although the use of gloves reduces the risk of sharps injuries in health care, use among healthcare workers is inconsistent and may be influenced by risk perception and healthcare culture. Glove use should be emphasized as a key element of multimodal sharps-injury reduction programs.
标准预防措施被提倡用于减少由针和锐器医疗设备(“锐器伤”)导致的伤害数量,但手套在预防此类伤害方面的效果尚未得到证实。我们评估了与戴手套相关的因素,并确定了戴手套的做法与锐器伤风险之间的关联。
常规频率病例交叉研究。
美国和加拿大的 13 个医疗中心。
在锐器伤后就诊于员工健康诊所的 636 名医护人员。
通过结构化电话问卷评估受伤时的通常行为和情况。
在 636 名受伤的医护人员中,195 人在受伤时正在手术室或手术套房中进行手术准备,441 人在其他地方受伤。与治疗其他患者相比,当治疗被认为具有高人类免疫缺陷病毒、乙型肝炎病毒或丙型肝炎病毒感染风险的患者时,未进行手术准备的个体更常戴手套(校正优势比[OR],2.53 [95%置信区间{CI},1.30-4.91])。护士(OR,0.11 [95%CI,0.04-0.32])和其他员工(OR,0.24 [95%CI,0.07-0.77])比医生和医生受训者更不常戴手套。在病例交叉分析中,手套可降低受伤风险(发病率比[IRR],0.33 [95%CI,0.22-0.50])。在进行手术准备的个体中,参与矫形手术与受伤时双层手套有关(OR,13.7 [95%CI,4.55-41.3]);这种戴手套的做法与降低受伤风险有关(IRR,0.20 [95%CI,0.10-0.42])。
尽管在医疗保健中使用手套可降低锐器伤的风险,但医护人员的使用不一致,并且可能受到风险认知和医疗保健文化的影响。应强调手套的使用作为多模式锐器伤减少计划的关键要素。