Department of Physical Therapy, Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Pomona, New Jersey 08240, USA.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Aug;26(6):358-73. doi: 10.3109/09593980903219050.
The Delphi survey is a useful mechanism to make recommendations for clinical judgments in the absence of practice guidelines for evidence-based decision making. Although there is a great deal of literature about the topic of various methods of balance assessment, decisions about application of research evidence for clinical practice may be subject to personal interpretation and/or biases of the reader. In this study, a panel of informed experts was used through a Delphi process to establish consensus regarding the recommended use of selected balance assessment methods based on the literature. Selective recruitment of experienced faculty members with advanced degrees and/or specialist certification in the content area identified seven knowledgeable informants. The panel participated in three rounds of discussion to develop a consensus-based summary of the recommended use of balance assessment methods commonly used in clinical practice and suggest how those measures fit within the framework of the Patient/Client Management Model of physical therapy practice. The outcomes of the Delphi process form a basis for recommended practice in the examination of patients with balance deficits and serve as a starting point in the development of evidence-based practice guidelines.
德尔菲调查是一种有用的机制,可以在缺乏循证决策实践指南的情况下为临床判断提供建议。尽管有大量关于各种平衡评估方法的文献,但应用研究证据进行临床实践的决策可能会受到读者个人解释和/或偏见的影响。在这项研究中,通过德尔菲法使用一组知情专家,根据文献就选定的平衡评估方法的推荐应用达成共识。有选择性地招募具有高级学位和/或在内容领域的专业认证的经验丰富的教师,确定了 7 名知识渊博的信息提供者。专家组参与了三轮讨论,以制定一份基于共识的常用平衡评估方法的推荐使用总结,建议这些措施如何适应物理治疗实践的患者/客户管理模型框架。德尔菲过程的结果为平衡缺陷患者检查的推荐实践提供了依据,并为循证实践指南的制定提供了起点。