Massey B T, Dodds W J, Hogan W J, Brasseur J G, Helm J F
Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Gastroenterology. 1991 Aug;101(2):344-54.
The findings of concurrent esophageal videofluoroscopy and manometry in 15 patients with major disturbances of esophageal motor function were evaluated and the data were analyzed from a fluid mechanical perspective. Each of 153 fluoroscopic barium swallow sequences was analyzed on a swallow-by-swallow basis. Two distinct pressure domains were identified: intrabolus pressure and pressure within a bolus-free contracting esophageal segment. Analyses in terms of these pressure domains showed specific and consistent correlations between the radiographic and manometric findings. Radiography was insensitive to contractions occurring in esophageal segments devoid of bolus fluid, whereas manometry was insensitive to contractions that did not occlude the lumen. It is concluded that using fluid mechanical principles of bolus transport allows meaningful comparison of esophageal motility as recorded by radiography and intraluminal manometry. However, the inherent limitations in the range of physical phenomena recorded by each modality make these techniques complementary for evaluating esophageal motor function.
对15例食管运动功能严重紊乱患者同步进行食管视频透视检查和测压的结果进行了评估,并从流体力学角度对数据进行了分析。对153个透视下钡剂吞咽序列逐次吞咽进行分析。确定了两个不同的压力区域:团块内压力和无团块收缩食管段内的压力。根据这些压力区域进行的分析显示,影像学和测压结果之间存在特定且一致的相关性。放射成像对无团块流体的食管段发生的收缩不敏感,而测压对未阻塞管腔的收缩不敏感。得出的结论是,利用团块传输的流体力学原理可以对放射成像和腔内测压记录的食管运动进行有意义的比较。然而,每种方法记录的物理现象范围的固有局限性使得这些技术在评估食管运动功能方面具有互补性。