不同聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素制剂在临床前模型中的药代动力学、疗效和毒性:常规生物等效性方法是否足以确保聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素产品的治疗等效性?
Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity of different pegylated liposomal doxorubicin formulations in preclinical models: is a conventional bioequivalence approach sufficient to ensure therapeutic equivalence of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin products?
机构信息
Preclinical Development, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Development LLC, 1000 US 202S, Raritan, NJ, USA.
出版信息
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;66(6):1173-84. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1406-x. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
PURPOSE
To examine whether a conventional bioequivalence approach is sufficient to ensure the therapeutic equivalence of liposomal products, the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity of different formulation variants of the marketed Doxil(/Caelyx product, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), were evaluated in several preclinical models.
METHODS
Six different variants of the marketed PLD formulation were prepared by incorporating minor changes in the composition and liposome size of the original formulation. The pharmacokinetics of 5 formulations were evaluated in albino mice following i.v. administration at 6 mg/kg. Selected variants along with Doxil/Caelyx (formulation 1, Doxil-control) were tested for antitumor activity in the MDA-MB-231 xenograft mouse model following 3 repeated administrations at 2 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg (once weekly for 3 weeks) and/or toxicity in Cynomolgus monkeys following 6 repeated administrations at 2.5 or 4.0 mg/kg. Formulations 1-4 were tested for antitumor activity and formulations 1, 2, 6 and 7 were evaluated in a monkey toxicity study. The toxicokinetics of total doxorubicin was determined after the first and last dose in the monkey toxicity study.
RESULTS
In the albino mouse, formulations 2 and 3 had plasma pharmacokinetic profiles similar to Doxil-control (formulation 1). Although these three formulations had similar pharmacokinetic profiles, formulation 2 showed significantly (P < 0.05) longer survival time and better efficacy (reduced tumor volume) over other formulations tested for antitumor activity at the 3 mg/kg dose. In monkeys, formulation 2 gave systemic exposure of doxorubicin approximately the same as formulation 1; however, multi-focal degeneration of renal cortical tubules and hypocellularity of the bone marrow were observed with formulation 2 but not with formulation 1 (Doxil-control). Formulations 6 and 7 gave lower exposure to doxorubicin compared to Doxil-control, but were associated with higher severity and frequency of toxic effects (hematological effects, elevated liver enzymes). It was concluded that plasma pharmacokinetics and systemic exposure of doxorubicin did not correlate well with the antitumor activity and toxicity profiles for PLD products. Hence, a conventional bioequivalence approach is not appropriate for establishing therapeutic equivalence of generic PLD products. A carefully designed clinical study evaluating clinical safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics should be considered for establishing the therapeutic equivalency of generic versions of Doxil.
目的
为了研究常规生物等效性方法是否足以确保脂质体产品的治疗等效性,本研究评估了已上市的多柔比星脂质体(Doxil/ Caelyx,聚乙二醇化脂质体多柔比星(PLD))不同制剂变异体在几种临床前模型中的药代动力学、疗效和毒性。
方法
通过对原始制剂的组成和脂质体大小进行微小改变,制备了市售 PLD 制剂的 6 种不同变体。在静脉注射 6mg/kg 后,通过在白化小鼠中评估 5 种制剂的药代动力学。选择的变体与 Doxil/ Caelyx(制剂 1,Doxil-对照)一起,在 MDA-MB-231 异种移植小鼠模型中进行 3 次重复给药(每 2 周 1 次,持续 3 周)和/或在食蟹猴中进行 6 次重复给药(2.5 或 4.0mg/kg)的抗肿瘤活性和毒性。在猴子毒性研究中测试制剂 1-4 的抗肿瘤活性和制剂 1、2、6 和 7 的毒性。在猴子毒性研究中,在第一次和最后一次剂量后确定总多柔比星的毒代动力学。
结果
在白化小鼠中,制剂 2 和 3 的血浆药代动力学特征与 Doxil-对照(制剂 1)相似。尽管这三种制剂具有相似的药代动力学特征,但制剂 2 在 3mg/kg 剂量下显示出显著(P<0.05)更长的生存时间和更好的疗效(减少肿瘤体积),优于其他测试制剂。在猴子中,制剂 2 给予的多柔比星系统暴露与制剂 1 大致相同;然而,与制剂 1(Doxil-对照)相比,制剂 2 观察到肾皮质小管多灶性变性和骨髓细胞减少。制剂 6 和 7 与 Doxil-对照相比,多柔比星的暴露水平较低,但与毒性作用(血液学作用、肝酶升高)的严重程度和频率较高相关。结论:多柔比星脂质体产品的药代动力学和系统暴露与抗肿瘤活性和毒性特征相关性不佳。因此,对于建立普通 PLD 产品的治疗等效性,常规生物等效性方法并不合适。对于建立多柔比星的通用版本的治疗等效性,应考虑进行精心设计的临床安全性、疗效和药代动力学评估的临床研究。