Dipartimenti Fisiopatologia Clinica, Universitàd i Firenze, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Lipids Health Dis. 2010 Jul 27;9:80. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-9-80.
Treatment guidelines recommend LDL-C as the primary target of therapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, combination therapies with lipid-lowering drugs that have different mechanisms of action are recommended when it is not possible to attain LDL-C targets with statin monotherapy. Understanding which treatment or patient-related factors are associated with attaining a target may be clinically relevant.
Data were pooled from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies. After stabilization on simvastatin 20 mg, patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) alone and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 20 mg (EZ/Simva) or simvastatin 40 mg. The change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), TC/HDL-C ratio, triglycerides, and the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) after 6 weeks of treatment were assessed, and factors significantly correlated with the probability of achieving LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L in a population of high cardiovascular risk Italian patients were identified. A stepwise logistic regression model was conducted with LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L at endpoint as the dependent variable and study, treatment, gender, age (> or = 65 years or < 65 years), as independent variables and baseline LDL-C (both as continuous and discrete variable).
EZ/Simva treatment (N = 93) resulted in significantly greater reductions in LDL-C, TC, and TC/HDL-C ratio and higher attainment of LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L vs doubling the simvastatin dose to 40 mg (N = 106). Study [including diabetic patients (OR = 2.9, p = 0.003)], EZ/Simva treatment (OR = 6.1, p < 0.001), and lower baseline LDL-C (OR = 0.9, p = 0.001) were significant positive predictors of LDL-C target achievement. When baseline LDL-C was expressed as a discrete variable, the odds of achieving LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L was 4.8 in favor of EZ/Simva compared with Simva 40 mg (p < 0.001), regardless of baseline LDL-C level.
EZ/Simva is an effective therapeutic option for patients who have not achieved recommended LDL-C treatment targets with simvastatin 20 mg monotherapy.
Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT00423488 and NCT00423579.
治疗指南建议将 LDL-C 作为高胆固醇血症患者治疗的主要目标。此外,当单独使用他汀类药物无法达到 LDL-C 目标时,建议使用具有不同作用机制的降脂药物联合治疗。了解哪些治疗或患者相关因素与达到目标相关可能具有临床意义。
数据来自两项多中心、随机、双盲研究。在稳定使用辛伐他汀 20mg 后,单独患有冠心病 (CHD) 和/或 2 型糖尿病 (T2DM) 的患者被随机分配至依折麦布 10mg/辛伐他汀 20mg (EZ/Simva) 或辛伐他汀 40mg。评估治疗 6 周后 LDL-C、总胆固醇 (TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇 (HDL-C)、TC/HDL-C 比值、甘油三酯的基线变化,以及达到 LDL-C<2.6mmol/L(100mg/dL)的患者比例,并确定意大利高心血管风险患者人群中与 LDL-C<2.6mmol/L 达标概率显著相关的因素。采用逐步逻辑回归模型,以 LDL-C<2.6mmol/L 作为因变量,研究、治疗、性别、年龄(≥65 岁或<65 岁)作为自变量,基线 LDL-C(连续和离散变量)作为因变量。
与双倍剂量辛伐他汀 40mg 相比,依折麦布联合辛伐他汀治疗 (N=93) 可显著降低 LDL-C、TC 和 TC/HDL-C 比值,并且 LDL-C<2.6mmol/L 的达标率更高。研究[包括糖尿病患者(OR=2.9,p=0.003)]、依折麦布联合辛伐他汀治疗 (OR=6.1,p<0.001) 和较低的基线 LDL-C(OR=0.9,p=0.001)是 LDL-C 目标达标显著的正预测因子。当以离散变量表示基线 LDL-C 时,与辛伐他汀 40mg 相比,依折麦布联合辛伐他汀治疗 LDL-C<2.6mmol/L 的优势比为 4.8(p<0.001),而与基线 LDL-C 水平无关。
对于辛伐他汀 20mg 单药治疗未达到 LDL-C 治疗目标的患者,依折麦布联合辛伐他汀治疗是一种有效的治疗选择。
临床试验注册号:NCT00423488 和 NCT00423579。