Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine Department, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Evgenidio Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Papadiamantopoulou St, Athens, Greece.
Respir Med. 2010 Oct;104(10):1557-65. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.03.009.
Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) suffer from ventilatory abnormalities. This study examined the effects of interval exercise training on the respiratory drive in CHF patients.
Forty-six clinically stable CHF patients (38 males/8 women, mean age = 53 +/- 11 years) participated in an exercise rehabilitation program (ERP) 3 times/week, for 12 weeks by interval training modality with or without the addition of resistance training. All patients underwent symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and measurements of mouth occlusion pressure at 100 ms (P(0.1)) and maximum inspiratory muscle strength (P(Imax)) before and after ERP. Respiratory drive was estimated by mouth occlusion pressure P(0.1) and P(0.1)/P(Imax) ratio at rest, and the ventilatory pattern by resting mean inspiratory flow (V(T)/T(I)) and by V(T)/T(I) at identical CPET workloads, before and after ERP. We also studied a control non exercising group of 11 patients (8 men and 3 women).
P(0.1) at rest decreased from 3.04 +/- 1.52 to 2.62 +/- 0.9 cmH(2)O (p = 0.015), P(0.1)/P(Imax) % at rest from 4.56 +/- 3.73 to 3.69 +/- 2.03 (p = 0.006), resting V(T)/T(I) from 0.44 +/- 0.10 to 0.41 +/- 0.10 l/s (p = 0.014), and V(T)/T(I) at identical work rate from 2.13 +/- 0.59 to 1.93 +/- 0.58 l/s (p = 0.001) after ERP. VO(2) at peak exercise increased from 16.3 +/- 4.8 to 18.5 +/- 5.3 ml/kg/min (p < 0.001) in the exercise group. No improvement was noted in the control group.
ERP by interval training improves the respiratory drive and ventilatory pattern at rest and during exercise in CHF patients.
慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者存在呼吸异常。本研究旨在探讨间歇运动训练对 CHF 患者呼吸驱动的影响。
46 例临床稳定的 CHF 患者(38 名男性/8 名女性,平均年龄 53±11 岁)参与了一项运动康复计划(ERP),每周 3 次,采用间歇训练模式,共 12 周,同时或不进行抗阻训练。所有患者均进行了症状限制心肺运动测试(CPET),并在 ERP 前后测量了口腔阻断压 100ms(P(0.1))和最大吸气肌力量(P(Imax))。通过口腔阻断压 P(0.1)和 P(0.1)/P(Imax)比值在休息时评估呼吸驱动,通过休息时平均吸气流量(V(T)/T(I))和在相同 CPET 工作量时的 V(T)/T(I)评估通气模式。我们还研究了 11 例不运动的对照组患者(8 名男性和 3 名女性)。
休息时的 P(0.1)从 3.04±1.52cmH(2)O 降至 2.62±0.9cmH(2)O(p=0.015),休息时的 P(0.1)/P(Imax)%从 4.56±3.73%降至 3.69±2.03%(p=0.006),休息时的 V(T)/T(I)从 0.44±0.10l/s 降至 0.41±0.10l/s(p=0.014),在相同的工作率下,V(T)/T(I)从 2.13±0.59l/s 降至 1.93±0.58l/s(p=0.001)。ERP 后,峰值运动时的 VO(2)从 16.3±4.8ml/kg/min 增加到 18.5±5.3ml/kg/min(p<0.001)。对照组无改善。
间歇训练的 ERP 通过改善 CHF 患者休息和运动时的呼吸驱动和通气模式。