Department of History, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203-0650, USA.
J Homosex. 2010;57(7):842-61. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2010.493414.
Standard accounts of the National Organization for Women (NOW) seriously underplay the duration of tensions between heterosexual and lesbian NOW members and the ways those tensions included both racialized analogies and tactical concerns. Based on personal papers, archival sources, interviews, and a re-evaluation of printed sources, I argue that by considering the perspective of national, state, and local lesbian feminist NOW members, we see tensions from the 1960s through the 1980s that have been missed by studies that focus either on NOW or on the growth of lesbian feminism or on second-wave feminist development generally. To legitimize their position, White lesbian feminists analogized their oppression with that of racial minorities while claiming to be better feminists than heterosexual women. Their approach is significant to conceptualizing the scope of feminist issues and tactics, the ways White women's discussion of race exacerbated racial divisions, and the fate of the Equal Rights Amendment.
关于全国妇女组织(NOW)的标准描述严重低估了异性恋和女同性恋 NOW 成员之间紧张关系的持续时间,以及这些紧张关系包括种族类比和策略性问题的方式。基于个人论文、档案资料、采访以及对印刷资料的重新评估,我认为,通过考虑全国、州和地方女同性恋女权主义 NOW 成员的观点,我们可以看到从 20 世纪 60 年代到 80 年代的紧张关系,这些关系被那些要么专注于 NOW,要么专注于女同性恋女权主义的增长,要么专注于第二次女权浪潮发展的研究所忽略。为了使自己的立场合法化,白人女同性恋女权主义者将自己的压迫与少数族裔的压迫进行类比,同时声称自己比异性恋女性更优秀的女权主义者。她们的方法对于概念化女权主义问题和策略的范围、白人女性对种族的讨论如何加剧种族分裂以及平等权利修正案的命运具有重要意义。