Rowlandson Ian, Xue Joel, Farrell Robert
GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI 53226, USA.
J Electrocardiol. 2010 Nov-Dec;43(6):497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
With the advent of thrombolytics, guidelines for ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) recognition were presented in terms of an ST segment exceeding a particular level (1 or 2 mm) in 2 contiguous leads. However, more than half of prehospital electrocardiograms that exceed these ST criteria are from patients not having an acute myocardial infarction. In contrast, expert physicians (EXMD) maintain a high specificity (>95%) for the recognition of STEMI. Likewise, in terms of increasing sensitivity, it has been found that the EXMD will classify STEMI at lower levels than specified in the guideline. Thus, the EXMD uses additional electrocardiogram features to identify patients for appropriate intervention. Given that STEMI can be defined in terms of a pattern that is recognized by the EXMD as well as a clinical classification that can be evaluated in terms of clinical outcomes, the development and validation of a computer algorithm for STEMI need to include both the art of understanding how the human is detecting STEMI as well as the science required to develop quantified criteria based on clinical outcomes. Evidence is presented that demonstrates that reciprocal depression is a strong indicator of STEMI versus other causes of ST elevation.
随着溶栓药物的出现,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的识别指南以2个相邻导联中ST段超过特定水平(1或2毫米)来呈现。然而,超过这些ST标准的院外心电图中,超过一半来自没有急性心肌梗死的患者。相比之下,专家医生(EXMD)对STEMI的识别具有较高的特异性(>95%)。同样,在提高敏感性方面,已发现EXMD会将STEMI分类到比指南规定更低的水平。因此,EXMD使用额外的心电图特征来识别患者以便进行适当干预。鉴于STEMI可以根据EXMD识别的模式以及可根据临床结果评估的临床分类来定义,用于STEMI的计算机算法的开发和验证需要既包括理解人类如何检测STEMI的技巧,也包括基于临床结果制定量化标准所需的科学。有证据表明,ST段压低是STEMI与其他ST段抬高原因相比的一个强有力指标。